|
One clutch is trying to do the work of two.
No matter how brilliant the software and engineering, it will NEVER be as smooth, predictable and responsive as a two-clutch assembly.
Honda clearly paid a great deal of money to the Japanese company who designed it. (Can't remember their name. Sorry). Yet they must have realised that it would always be inferior to any two-clutch box.
So why did they continue with it? Was it arrogance?
It can't possibly have been ignorance.
I wonder if they're regretting it now.
And what are the chances that, come 2009/10, it'll be gone?
|