|2nd March 2009, 21:45||#1 (permalink)|
2006 Civic diesel vs. 2009 Civic diesel vs. Golf 6 diesel
2006 Civic vs. 2009 Civic
I recently spent a week with a 2009 model 5 door diesel Civic. I felt it would be useful and interesting to compare it with my 2006 diesel Civic. Furthermore, I then decided to compare it to the new Golf 6, just for fun.
The obvious changes are the painted grey plastic trim pieces, the controversial grill, the smooth trim at the rear and the slightly modified rear lights. In practice, they look very similar at first glance with the new style of wheel being the most obvious change. The painted plastics are no more or less offensive than the unpainted ones, and the grill is far less obvious than photographs suggest. Though I'm sure that many will opt to spend a few quid and go for the Type S grill instead.
Rear light cluster:
Painted grey trim:
Mock-up of the 09 car with a Type S grill:
The rear lights have moved around a little too. The sidelights are smaller, and the fog light has shifted inboard. The reversing lights are a little wider and the indicators have gone from orange to clear.
With fog light on:
Moving inside brings a feeling that the quality of the build has improved very slightly, all over. The centre console feels more solid with smaller gaps, the cig lighter is now secure, the sliding lid on the central bin doesn't screech when you move it and the glove box lid now fits the aperture.
The brushed silver parts are now dark brushed silver, and there are new buttons on the central dash for headlight wash and parking sensors.
Moving into the centre bin finds the USB connector (it actually has a flying lead to prevent damage to the socket), the extra 12V outlet and the 3.5mm jack input.
Plugging in a USB drive with folders containing mp3 files gives you instant access to your music. The display is clear, and the steering wheel controls work well (a short push on the + button to go to the next track, and a long push to go to the next folder). Sadly, the sound quality of the whole system has not changed, and whilst it is quite acceptable when stationary, it struggles to overcome the road noise when on the move.
The satnav now uses new hardware (although the screen is unchanged and it has not got the new high quality one found on the 09 Accord), which allows you to download the contents of your mobile phone contact list into the car:
You can now search and dial a number from the phonebook shown on the satnav screen (or indeed any POI):
You also get a useful display in the centre of the instrument panel. When you push the HFT talk button, you get a display of battery charge and signal strength. Incoming call phone numbers (but not names) are shown, as are outbound call numbers:
Total HFT visual feedback in the 06 car:
And in the 09 car:
My 09 car had the optional leather interior and panoramic roof fitted. The leather seats felt no different to the cloth ones, and the roof worked well (though it's not my cup of tea so I left it closed most of the time). It's a shame that the heated seats are only available with leather (in the UK) - they were a nice addition.
There are a couple of changes around the speedometer area too. Firstly the inclusion of a shift Up/Down pair of lights. These will just encourage you to drive economically, if you're not sure how to do that. I tried following them for a bit, but they just encourage an early up-change at all times, which if you're reading the road is possibly not what's needed. Also the massive over-read in the 06 speedo has gone - at 70 mph it was +4.5 mph, and it is now just +1.8 mph (the Accord is +1.5 mph).
The car also had the auto-dimming mirror - a very worthwhile option if you do plenty of miles at night. It was quick to respond and dimmed just the right amount.
On the road:
Initially, it appeared that nothing much had changed. I was doing long night time trips and the only obvious change was the two extra, and quite disctracting, green lights. The one on the rear mirror was fairly easy to ignore, but the non-dimming one on the parking sensors button was bright and straight into your face. The only solution was to turn the parking sensors off, which is not ideal.
The engine felt a bit rougher than mine, it had a little more of a dieselly noise (mine has none), but I am certain that this is down to it's low mileage. It just goes to reinforce the fact that these cars need a good 10,000 miles to really smooth out.
The headlights have not improved either - still the same patchwork of light and dark areas, with a poorly defined and slightly wonky cutoff.
Oddly, the ride and noise seemed identical. If I leaned back, the noise at the rear has been reduced slightly, but the road, engine and wind noise in the front seemed unchanged. And the ride quality again seemed unchanged - the same banging and crashing over slight bumps, roar from the tyres and constant high frequency bouncing on any road that was less than perfect. Not what I was expecting.
I decided to investigate this further, because this was the real promise of this car - a suspension system tuned for a little more comfort.
Luckily both cars had identical tyres (Bridgestone Turanzas, all eight tyres having 6mm of tread) on identically sized wheels. So I picked a bit of motorway with two surface types (smooth and normal) and drove up and down it measuring the noise with a noise meter.
All readings are dBA, the speed was corrected for speedo error, (1) is a slightly rough surface, meter by left ear and (2) is the same slightly rough surface, meter by right ear.
In reality, the 2 Civics are inseparable "by ear" - with each quite noisy and the noise increasing and decreasing significantly with road surface quality. I can only guess the slightly higher reading on the 09 car was down to the reflective acoustic properties of the leather interior.
Ride and comfort:
Again, both cars appeared to drive identically. I just couldn't feel the expected softer ride. At all.
On perfectly smooth roads all is good. On concrete roads (or a slightly uneven surface) the nose does a high frequency jiggle. On small bumps the bump is harshly transferred to the shell - but it tends to be just around the front. So the bump noise appears as a crackling from the dash, windscreen and footwell. On larger bumps the crashing noise seems to come from all around, as if every component in the car from front to back is banged into it's neighbour.
Round corners on a smooth road, again the quickly geared steering is good, albeit with little feedback. On a slightly bumpy road the car will require constant steering with small corrections, and with a large bump the car will change direction quite significantly, requiring a positive steering input.
Coming into my driveway (over a very small raised kerb and over some uneven gravel) both cars rattled as if all suspension linkages had an inch of play in.
So both cars feel the same. Convinced I must have made some kind of assessment error, I decide to measure the spring rates by noting front and rear suspension deflection, using two large people on the boot sill or sitting in the engine bay. Measurements are in mm, from the ground to the top of the wheel arch:
So, the suspension is identical and unchanged.
The Civic is a fine car, and the new model has benefited from the constant improvements in manufacture - the most obvious being the fit and finish of the interior. It has a couple of new features, which are nice to have (especially the USB connection). The cosmetic changes are only small, and the ride, noise, steering and comfort are unchanged.
2009 Civic vs. 2009 Golf 6
While I was at it, I thought it would be fun to do a back to back with the new Golf 6. I drove around the area near to the local VW dealer and came up with a test route that included a fast dual carriageway and a bumpy twisty back road. At the dealer, I managed to get a drive in exactly what I felt was a good comparison - a 5 door 140 diesel manual GT spec car.
Prodding and poking:
Looking round the Golf, you can't help but notice how bland and almost ugly the car is from the outside. The elegance of the Golf 4 has gone, and even the togetherness of the Golf 5 has been replaced by the very awkward nose of the Golf 6. There are some strange features - most notably the droopy door handles that look like a fat bloke has leant on them and they had lost the battle.
Inside is more familiar. The cabin is about the same size, but the close and high dash (carried over from the Golf 1) makes it feel a little less airy. There are some nice touches in there (like the individual reading lights for the rear passengers) and the seats feel supportive and comfortable. But you can see and feel the cost cutting - the aircon controls felt wobbly and the standard radio display looked like something from the late 80's.
On the road:
As I set off I had one of those mouth open moments. Two very fundamental things that you get totally accustomed to, had nearly gone. Road noise: nearly silent. Engine noise: nearly silent, and totally vibration free. It's not a miracle - it's what you get in a large Lexus or S-class Merc. But it throws you totally off guard when you find it in a hatch.
Working the engine was a pleasure - totally smooth, linear and quiet. Brilliant, unlike the rattly old unit in the Golf 5.
Cruising was a pleasure - it just wafted along, requiring no steering corrections, and was soothing and, er, quiet.
Having done the back lane in the Civic, I was quite looking forward to a good thrash in the Golf. The Civic made this road quite exciting; you needed to work hard to get a good result, but there were a couple of potholes that made the Civic sound like I'd had a minor accident. The Golf could not have been more different - the suspension silently and precisely absorbed all the irregularities and bumps, without noise and drama. The effort of driving reduced dramatically, you just pointed the car and that's where it went in a fluid and relaxed fashion. And all the bumping and banging was now just a distant memory as the Golf gave nothing more than a muted rumble - and with it the beautifully weighted steering just took you where you wanted to go. All memories of the bitsy exterior, the smaller boot and the '70s dash were gone.
Over the two major potholes, the Golf just did a rubbery thump. The Golf really has achieved the nirvana, sharp handling with rapid turn-in from precise steering, but a ride that is quiet and absorbs the road like a Lexus. I'm not sure how to say this, but it's better in every respect than my Accord. And the 09 Accord.
For completeness, after handing back the Golf I did the trip again in the Civic and the difference was startling. Back came the engine noise, the road noise and the bouncy ride.
If you care about style and need maximum practicality, then the Civic is better. If driving quality and comfort are your primary consideration, then the Golf is a decade ahead. How the role has reversed!
Thank You to Pottsy from 35 Users:
2.2escdti, 4540flossy, anti-rsca, bobbybliss, boothy, Chellebell, chrishunt, civicer, civicfan, DervDriver, Dimplyred, Glepor, HappyMan, jay_s, jun761, Jutto, Korkut Varol, Kremmen, martin_1.8, MeganoOdles, micky dee, Minas, morten, NoNumpty, okehciv, Pacarcher, panman, Protoclown, robbo51, Sandozer, soponcio_virtual, steveloc, Tenshi, TTDegs, vampiro
|2nd March 2009, 22:51||#5 (permalink)|
Car: 2009 2.2 EX 5 door
Join Date: 20th December 2008
Location: Cirencester, UK
Thanks given: 36
Thanked 30 Times in 29 Posts
What a fascinating and thorough write-up. Very frank about the 09 model and the contrast with the new Golf.
Slightly surprised just how good you found the Golf to be, as Autocar, in particular, seems to have gone cool on it since the original launch. I did sit in one, but it was so dull I passed on the test drive.
I particularly liked the superb pictures, and your obvious attention to detail, Pottsy. Brilliant!
|2nd March 2009, 23:11||#6 (permalink)|
Administrator** Thread starter **
Autocar in Sept: Volkswagen Golf 2.0 TDI - Road Test First Drive - Autocar.co.uk
Autocar in Feb: Volkswagen Golf 2.0 TDI 140 GT - Autocar.co.uk
As you say - goes from ace, to just good. They describe the steering as rubbery in the second article - I found it to be precise.
Finally, Autoexpress: Volkswagen Golf GT | First Drives | Car Reviews | Auto Express (gushing).
I have to say, I deliberately didn't read any reviews first. I felt as I sat in the car that it was odd looking and a bit dull - but that all changed after a few seconds of driving.
I do think that if Honda persist with the old-style suspension with the 2011 or 2012 replacement Civic, then they will lose a lot of sales to cars with modern suspension and decent refinement.
Thanks to Pottsy from:
|3rd March 2009, 08:05||#7 (permalink)|
Car: MY13 1.8 EX Auto
Join Date: 7th January 2007
Location: West London
Thanks given: 182
Thanked 233 Times in 208 Posts
When you posted earlier that the suspension had improved I wondered whether this was because you were comparing petrol to diesel where the tyre pressures differ, petrol being lower.
Your latest suspension review has put me into a different frame about getting another Civic. The suspension on mine, like all others, is dreadful and I won't be replacing like with like.
Come March next year I will be doing the rounds of the manufacturers by the sound of it.
|3rd March 2009, 08:27||#9 (permalink)|
Administrator** Thread starter **
I did assume that when Honda made the presentation to all of us and said that the suspension in the 5 door has been improved to give a better ride (in response to customer feedback) that in fact changes would have been made (spider graph).
The 3 door cars I drove felt the same as before (and do deal with the harsh ride slightly better with their stiffer shell) and the 1.8AT felt good (but it has got entirely new suspension settings, because it is a new, heavier car).
|3rd March 2009, 08:41||#11 (permalink)|
Car: 09 1.4 iVTEC CBP Silverstone
Join Date: 18th February 2009
Location: Ermelo, NL
Thanks given: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Good an honest review! While testdriving a few cars the Civic was the only car that made me smile. I've driven the Focus, with it's highly acclaimed roadhold, but still I liked the Civic more. Maybe the Golf drives much better, but in the end I so much more like the looks of the Civic! The Civic is special and rare: in a circle of 500 meters from my house there are probably 10 Golfs, in a Circle of 5km maybe 1 Civic (if any...).
I didn't drive the Golf since I don't like it. It's ugly, boring and much too common.
|3rd March 2009, 09:08||#13 (permalink)|
Join Date: 19th June 2007
Thanks given: 48
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
Yes, thats why I chose the Civic, it made me smile, where the Golf or A3 simply didn't.
So why can't a manufacturer make a car that ticks all the boxes? Its seems so simple on the face of it?!
I'll be looking at a Golf again next time I come up for renewal, because it is a nice car and the ride and comfort is excellent, but again, I may not be able to live with the dullness factor; I really don't like the rear styling at all.
Thanks for the review, very good as always!
|3rd March 2009, 09:30||#14 (permalink)|
Civic gone, not forgotten
Car: Pug 4007, 308CC, Clio dci
Join Date: 11th June 2007
Thanks given: 25
Thanked 29 Times in 29 Posts
|3rd March 2009, 09:58||#15 (permalink)|
Administrator** Thread starter **
It's not so much speed bumps - but the continuous movement of the wheels over every single change in the road surface, with many changes in wheel direction every second. The Civic suffers in two ways:
1. Noise. To get really good stiffness at the front, the tops of the struts are mounted near the strong bulkhead of the car. But that mount is almost in the cabin and so noise is readily transmitted. The mounts for the beam rear suspension are very far forward (under the rear seats), also a good way to transmit noise.
2. Harshness. The beam suspension moves the wheels in 3 planes when it goes over a bump (the wheel goes up and down, and in an arc, and twists like a wheel that is steered). The bump movement accelerates the wheel in a new direction and the equal and opposite force to this acceleration moves the cabin (perceived as harshness).
You can take steps to fix or reduce either 1 or 2, and manufacturers modify the basic designs to suit their needs, or to reduce the secondary effects. So you can quieten down the beam suspension, but not entirely remove its fundamental characteristics. Likewise a complex suspension system like the Golf can be noisy (Golf 5), quiet (Golf 6) or a bit harsh (Civic 7). And the front works with the rear, so a poor front can negate a good rear, and vice versa.
One thing is for sure, the Civic uses the most basic type; more and more now this is only found on superminis and the bottom end of the hatch market. The cars at the top end of the hatch market are improving their designs with experience, and the gap is widening. If Honda persist with basic designs built with cheap parts (the damper quality springs to mind) then that is fine, but they will be positioning themselves to compete with the cars at the bottom of the market.
Thanks to Pottsy from:
|3rd March 2009, 10:27||#16 (permalink)|
Great info Pottsy. Many thanks.
I will be test driving the new Golf (1.4TSI 160HP DSG) for sure. Main reasons are good performance + DSG + lower tax additon for company cars due to CO2<140gr/km. Also, I like the way it looks (right now).
I'm also pretty sure that my next car will be a Honda. In about a year there will be so many Golfs on the road that it will be just another VW. I'm also afraid that driving a Golf will be so uninspiring, that I will be totally fed up with it within a year of driving. Whereas the Civic still puts a smile on my face every day.
|3rd March 2009, 10:53||#17 (permalink)|
- VW (and Seat, Skoda, Audi), Ford, BMW, Mitsubishi and Subaru have IRS in their hatchbacks.
- But Fiat, Peugeot, Citroen, Renault, Opel/Vauxhal and even Lancia have similar setups as the Civic.
- Alfa Romeo is (probably) moving from IRS to a twist beam with the new Milano (147 succesor), since this car is based on the Bravo.
I agree that if Honda want to be/reamain a premium brand they should definately move back to allround double wishbones and find a way to keep the magic seats.
|3rd March 2009, 11:29||#18 (permalink)|
Administrator** Thread starter **
I was thinking more by volume. Here the IRS cars dominate the market, with the Golf (and its variants) and the Focus swamping the market. The only other substantial seller is the Astra, which is on beam suspension (and will continue with it when the new one is built on the Delta 2 platform).
So the market will be in 2 sections: VAG + Ford, and GM + others (including Honda). GM decision seems to be recent (it was thought that the Astra would go multilink) and hasn't gone down well. Look at the post from "Barina" here.
|3rd March 2009, 11:46||#19 (permalink)|
|3rd March 2009, 11:58||#20 (permalink)|
Join Date: 5th September 2006
Thanks given: 0
Thanked 46 Times in 45 Posts
For me, the Civic's suspension is poor by any standards. I can only compare it to an oldish Seat Leon and an Auris, both with twist-beam suspension like the Civic and both much more comfortable. Honda really need to do something about it, the jarring ride makes the whole car feel cheap.
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.civinfo.com/forum/2009-civic/23699-2006-civic-diesel-vs-2009-civic-diesel-vs-golf-6-diesel.html
|Honda Civic restyling 2009 - Riassunto a pag.1 - Pagina 13||This thread||Refback||5th July 2012 13:24|
|Golf's, I just don't get it.||This thread||Refback||26th December 2011 22:51|
|Golf's, I just don't get it.||This thread||Refback||26th December 2011 13:25|
|Honda forum :: Poglej temo - Honda Civic 8.gen. pokanje v podvozju||This thread||Refback||6th February 2010 15:07|
|www.clubhondacivic.com - Ver Tema - me voy a cagar en to!||This thread||Refback||7th January 2010 18:06|
|Fanali post civic VS civic restyling||This thread||Refback||22nd December 2009 09:58|
|Forums CivicYume • Afficher le sujet - Modeles 2009 ?||This thread||Refback||25th October 2009 09:14|
|Forums CivicYume • Afficher le sujet - Modeles 2009 ?||This thread||Refback||23rd August 2009 23:37|
|Forums CivicYume • Afficher le sujet - Modeles 2009 ?||This thread||Refback||15th August 2009 19:41|
|Forums CivicYume • Afficher le sujet - Modeles 2009 ?||This thread||Refback||6th June 2009 09:43|
|Forums CivicYume • Afficher le sujet - Modeles 2009 ?||This thread||Refback||31st May 2009 06:48|
|Forums CivicYume • Afficher le sujet - Modeles 2009 ?||This thread||Refback||30th May 2009 19:24|
|Forums CivicYume • Afficher le sujet - Modeles 2009 ?||This thread||Refback||29th May 2009 21:36|
|Forums CivicYume • Afficher le sujet - Modeles 2009 ?||This thread||Refback||26th May 2009 19:13|
|Forums CivicYume • Afficher le sujet - Modeles 2009 ?||This thread||Refback||20th May 2009 16:46|
|Forums CivicYume • Afficher le sujet - Modeles 2009 ?||This thread||Refback||20th May 2009 09:50|
|hondaclub-si.com :: Poglej temo - Honda Civic 8.gen. pokanje v podvozju||This thread||Refback||15th May 2009 10:49|
|Fanali post civic VS civic restyling - HONDA CIVIC TEAM||This thread||Refback||1st May 2009 21:56|
|www.clubhondacivic.com :: Ver tema - me voy a cagar en to!||This thread||Refback||17th March 2009 09:34|
|Honda Civic restyling 2009 - Riassunto a pag.1 - Pagina 14 - HONDA CIVIC TEAM||This thread||Refback||7th March 2009 18:26|
|Honda Civic restyling 2009 - Riassunto a pag.1 - Pagina 13 - HONDA CIVIC TEAM||This thread||Refback||5th March 2009 20:20|
|Una bella recensione delle nuove "feature" della Civic MY 2009||This thread||Refback||3rd March 2009 10:59|
|Similar Threads for: 2006 Civic diesel vs. 2009 Civic diesel vs. Golf 6 diesel|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Seat Leon Diesel ? Or another decent diesel ?||Rafferj||Any non Civic chat here please!||11||2nd December 2008 22:42|
|Clutch 2006 Civic 2.2 Diesel EX||curlyearly||Engines and Transmission||4||16th November 2008 14:06|
|2006 HONDA CIVIC 2.2 I-CTDi EX 5dr Diesel Hatchback||WonkySights||Classifieds archive||0||14th July 2008 14:24|
|New Civic Diesel||Buzby||General Discussion||7||20th January 2008 12:00|
|Civic 2006 Diesel Sport - what's it worth||willisthm||Classifieds archive||3||1st June 2007 10:14|