At the end of the day it's been said already "Which" tests range from cameras to cars and so they are quite clearly "a jack of all trades, and master of none". I drive a Type-R GT and although the comments are not incorrect they are opinionated strongly. I would rather take advice from renound car publications such as "Top Gear" who gave it their car of the year award or "Autoexpress" which also give it an impartial review mentioning weaker points about the car but recognising that the design, the style, the engine, handling, and ownership i.e residuals are all ahead of any of the rivals.
I don't get too bogged down with negativity or too hyped about positivity either. The truth is magazines have their favourites anyway, I mean "CAR" magazine might as well be called "renault" magazine, so it's clear half of them are on the payroll of manufacturers anyway!
And once one reviewer states something they all say much the same. It's like someone once said the Ford Focus is the best handling hatch - well after driving lots of them and my dad being a mechanic driving them all the time I can tell you that it is NOT the best handling at all, Ford probably just gave em' a few quid to say it!
RANT OVER lol
