Civinfo - View Single Post

GHGH · 11th June 2007, 12:42

I've followed Mustang Sally for 7500 km now.
My experience so far is that in LIGHT non urban driving, the real MPG is about 6 to 8 % poorer than the computer claims (which again is poorer than promised).
When driving in rough terrain - with many steep climbs and descents -the computer error becomes twice as large, again in my disfavour.

11th June 2007, 12:42	#3 (permalink)
GHGH Supporter Rocketship door handle Join Date: 13th March 2007 Location: Trondheim, Norway Posts: 1,045 Thanks: 2 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post iTrader: (0)	I've followed Mustang Sally for 7500 km now. My experience so far is that in LIGHT non urban driving, the real MPG is about 6 to 8 % poorer than the computer claims (which again is poorer than promised). When driving in rough terrain - with many steep climbs and descents -the computer error becomes twice as large, again in my disfavour.