![]() |
|
||
| This thread is about: Younger drivers - Posts split from Type R insurance, it's in Any non Civic chat here please! at the Honda Civic forum Civinfo; Originally Posted by Redciv Well FWH super moderator, you impose your decision on the rest of us and move a lot of posts which inspired ... | ||
| Help Search Stickers Surveys Wiki Forum |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Wiki | RSS | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 (permalink) | |
|
Supporter
Magic Rear Seat
Join Date: 16th August 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 896
|
Quote:
I am sorry you won't be visiting again but hope you do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) | |
|
Supporter
Magic Rear Seat
Join Date: 16th August 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 896
|
Quote:
I understand your point and it isn't driver apathy that I am talking about, although you make a good point. I still don't agree that younger drivers - on the whole - have enough experience to deal with a myriad of situations all at once. I personally know that the reactions I had ten years ago to driving have improved with age even though I am only 34 years old. My experience enables me to assess situations based on past experiences, enables me to judge speeds and dangers. I think that when you have a performance car you always want to push it that much further and 'see what it can do' - maybe a more experienced driver, maybe like yourself or others on here would be able to look at the situation in a different way and so on. I do take your driver apathy point and it's one worth including in this discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) | |
|
Type S GT
Civinfo guru
Join Date: 1st July 2007
Location: Bingley, W.Yorks
Posts: 2,196
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 (permalink) | |
|
Supporter
Magic Rear Seat
Join Date: 16th August 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 896
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Come on HFB join the club, we aren't THAT bad! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 (permalink) | |
|
Supporter
Magic Rear Seat
Join Date: 16th August 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 896
|
Quote:
HFB jack the lad was just being nice and welcoming and I agree with JTL relax and get involved with us. Last edited by HappyMan : 14th April 2008 at 21:50. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 (permalink) |
|
2know all is 2forgive all
Magic Rear Seat
Join Date: 7th October 2007
Location: Leicester
Posts: 631
|
lol you "experienced" guys make me laugh
i agree insurance stats show that young drivers have more accidents but i'm going to stick my neck out and say most of them are probably at low speed - reversing e.t.c and when you do get a youngster dying in a high speed crash its in the news and high profile because more than likely his 4 mates died with him. peer pressure? most definitely, but as i said in the other split topic a lot of it comes down to attitude and how someone was brought up. not everyone gives into peer pressure. anyway i drive a 100 miles round trip to uni everyday, and i feel i am MORE THAN competent enough to deal with ANY situation, just as well as you so called "experienced" drivers. i know im not the perfect driver but neither are any of you Like i said i don't think experience in driving should be defined by how many years you have been driving. Also when i was 20 i had a ferrari 360 on hire for a mates wedding for a week, was i inexperienced for that car, YES , but was i sensible and learn how to control the power and urge, YES experience? what a load of old b...... Last edited by NEEMSTAR : 14th April 2008 at 22:31. |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 (permalink) | |
|
Supporter
Magic Rear Seat
Join Date: 16th August 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 896
|
Quote:
i agree with you NEEMSTAR. Experience isn't just about years driving it is also about miles/kilometres driven. I agree that a young person with a round trip of 100 miles per day would be gaining valid experience and so could there fore be called 'experienced'. I accept your point that not every 'older' person has actually 'driven' a lot and so therefore would and could still be considered as 'inexperienced'. Maybe part of the problem in this discussion is the definition of 'experienced'? Surely NEEMSTAR is right that 'experience' can't be just connected to age but to actual miles covered? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 (permalink) |
|
Valve Cap
Join Date: 13th March 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 40
|
I personally think all drivers should no their own limits when driving a car, no matter what type of car you adjust it to suit your comfort level of driving just because its fast dosnt mean you have to drive it fast, drive it where you feel comftable and obviously within the speed limit that is!!!!
Im sure every one has had a few hairy moments when driving their car ive had a good few and from them you learn your limits and learn from your mistakes and adjust it for the next time, and of course the more experiance driving the more comftable you feel driving the car. I do agree that it wouldnt be the most sensible thing giving a 17 year old a fast car but i guess it just depends on the type of person driving it although at some point you will need to gain that experiance in a fast car and get used to the difference. Enjoy the car and i guess no your limits and be responsible is the best advice to anyone young or old. Anyway ramble ramble..... whats the cheapest quote you have had so far did you find any good ones as im looking about aswell Premium choice has gave me the best quote so far maybe because im still with them for my current car but tesco looks not to bad aswell. |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 (permalink) |
|
Supporter
Locking Wheelnut
Join Date: 19th December 2007
Location: Northern Ireland / Glasgow
Posts: 192
|
I'm sorry but you can't just brandish all young drivers with the image that they are careless and incapable of driving a powerful car! To be honest I find it quite surprising that people who are commenting on how you require experience don't appear themselves to have the maturity to see past a common stereotypy and realise that not all young drivers are the same.
I can see your point and no one can deny the statistics, yes young drivers are more likely to have an accident! However, I think that if the power of the car was related to the likelihood of a young driver having an accident the government would have realised this by now and restricted new drivers on what vehicles they can drive. Is it really going to make that much of a difference if someone is driving a Type-R at 100mph or a clapped out Clio at 100mph? I doubt very much it will. Just because the Type-R is a powerful car does not mean it is above the law or can do anything extra that other cars on British roads can’t. If a young driver is of the mind frame that they’re going to show off to their friends and that they ‘feel invincible’, they are going to do so no matter what car they are in. Yes the Type-R may have a faster 0-60 and a greater top speed but if they’re going for speed and they’re up in the 100’s I think it’s much of muchness as to what difference it will really make. The reason I felt so compelled to speak up is that I considered the Type-R, and despite not having gone for one, reading this thread and pretty much being told that I shouldn’t be allowed a Type-R simply because I’m 21 is rather ridiculous. The reason I wanted a Type-R was not necessarily for the performance but because I consider it to be the best looking of all the Civics. For everyday driving on the public highway, the fact that the Type-R is 2 or so seconds faster than my Civic really wouldn’t make any difference to my driving style or increase my likelihood of having an accident. If anything it would decrease it as I sure as heck wouldn’t have anyone put a mark on it, let alone myself cause damage to it! I hope I haven’t offended anyone, it certainly isn’t my intention. I have found this forum to be very informative and manned by a great bunch of people that have been extremely helpful. I simply will not sit back and silently accept criticism just because of my age! Regards, Colin |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 (permalink) |
|
Valve Cap
Join Date: 13th March 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 40
|
Oh just kinda wrote what NEEMSTAR said must be a quicker typer than me. I agree with what you say to.
I got a honda civic from my aunt who had the car from new and drove 58,000 miles in 8 years and ive had the car for 2 years around august and the car has now done 93,000 miles so it does show that experience is down to how much miles you drive and not how long. VET 2010, i chose the type r for the reasons you stated and i think uve hut the nail on the head if there gonna speed they will do it in any car. Last edited by ashkeenon : 14th April 2008 at 22:52. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 (permalink) | |
|
2know all is 2forgive all
Magic Rear Seat
Join Date: 7th October 2007
Location: Leicester
Posts: 631
|
Quote:
how anyone can make a judgement of an individuals "experience" without knowing anything about them perplexes me. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads for: Younger drivers - Posts split from Type R insurance
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| split posts from induction thread | angie4m | Recycle Bin | 10 | 22nd March 2008 18:15 |
| Dealing with tailgaters (split posts) | Topcat | Any non Civic chat here please! | 46 | 7th June 2007 21:34 |
| replace or rotate? (split posts) | TTDegs | Wheels, Tyres, Suspension and Brakes | 24 | 23rd March 2007 09:20 |
| Off topic rear wiper stuff (split posts) | Charles_Harding | Bugs, faults and irritations | 76 | 2nd February 2007 12:02 |
| Use of grammar - split posts | Parky | Site suggestions, feedback and rules | 26 | 3rd January 2007 11:29 |