![]() |
|
||
| This thread is about: Named driver insurance - fronting - (split thread), it's in Buying, Dealers and Servicing at the Honda Civic forum Civinfo; Any comeback Danko?... | ||
| Help Rules Search Stickers Surveys Wiki Forum |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
您看了
Triangular Exhaust
Join Date: 1st May 2006
Location: Surrey/Hants
Posts: 447
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
|
Quote:
What your doing is known "fronting" or "fronting up" in insurance circles and recently insurance companies have started investigating policys with "named drivers" under a certain age. It's actually illegal (breach of terms) to put a person as "named driver" and then allow them primary use of said car. If any claim were to be made the insurance company would then become very "interested" in the cars use if said claim was made with the "named driver" behind the wheel. They check that the named driver has thier own primary car, they check annual millage on both primary and named car, they check that primary owner of "fronted" car has no other car, if they do they check annual millage of Primary owner and compare across the two cars etc etc. put simply if the insurance company got the idea that you may be "fronting" they will investigate (up to and including employing the services of a thired party Private investigation firm). Should they discover they are correct in their fears they would cancel said policy on the spot, void any claims and it would be very difficult from that moment on for the original policy owner to reinsure any car as the "fronting up" would be stored against their name and said information would be available to all other car insurance companies. they certainly would not be able to insure a car with any named drivers under a certain age ever again. Fools game. http://www.localbroker.co.uk/news/ca...licyuser4=L000 and this one will open your eyes.. Insurance company cancels 800 "Fronting" policies in one go..... http://money.guardian.co.uk/insuranc...884126,00.html Like I said, fools game. ps. You will also have no "no claims" bonus in your name and come the time when you finally decide to come out from under the shadow and insure yourself you will be paying 17yr old new driver prices... no matter how old you are. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Locking Wheelnut
Join Date: 29th January 2007
Location: C
Posts: 153
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
iTrader: (0)
|
Yeah, i agree.
Unless of course u will actually be a proper 'named' drive and only drive it occasionally. Otherwise u might be better off getting ** own quote, in the long run of course. Right now it might seem expensive but it will reduce premiums drastically later on. I have been driving 5yrs now and i have managed to get my quote down to £880. Even tho i dont have any NCB i believe they still take into consideration the fact i have been on my own policies for that amount of time and at some points i did have NCB. Try Admiral for a quote. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
Magic Rear Seat
Join Date: 7th August 2006
Location: Midlands
Posts: 541
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
|
I wont be the one that drives the car as much... I have my own car now, I rarely drives the civic anymore, hence why my dad is concidering upgrading it to a Type R model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | ||
|
您看了
Triangular Exhaust
Join Date: 1st May 2006
Location: Surrey/Hants
Posts: 447
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
|
Quote:
So what car do you own yourself and is it insured in your name with you as the policy holder? (Seeing as you couldnt afford the insurance on the 1.4 Civic less than a year ago I'm interested to see what you've bought) Sorry, but you gave the distinct impression with your postings that on the 1.4 you were indeed the primary driver (the mods were very "young" related, cant see your dad wanting a Base box, ice upgrade, loud exhaust and bling bling wheels) and I don't see it being different if your dad buys a Type-R. I'm really trying but I am increasingly finding it very hard to beleive your posts. You start off saying how your "upgrading me current civic" but then claim the 1.4 isnt your car? When challenged the story changes continuosly to get you off the hook. Let me just remind you of your first post in this thread.... Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) | |
|
King of the rodeo
Civinfo guru
Join Date: 24th October 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 4,727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader: (0)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
|
Supporter
Magic Rear Seat
Join Date: 27th June 2006
Location: Budapest
Posts: 552
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
iTrader: (0)
|
Is this still a forum or a court of law?
Must admit, while I agree with CivPilot's rationale, we should be careful now (IMHO) to avoid turning this into a witchhunt. I made a comment earlier on, which perhaps helped move this thread towards something a bit more confrontational. And I'm starting to regret it! Ultimately, it's up to DanKo to decide how to go about insuring the vehicle. I think we've all learnt a bit more about fronting now, along with the risks involved. And who wouldn't want a Type R!! However, younger drivers need to accept (with good reason) that certain vehicles should not be available to them in the early part of their driving careers. I'm glad I built up my NCB from scratch in a lowly 1.4, which has since enabled me to drive more powerful cars. I do so responsibly and without having to resort fronting tactics. That's definitely the way to go!! But let's not start putting members into the dock!!! Last edited by jayt43; 23rd February 2007 at 14:59. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |
|
您看了
Triangular Exhaust
Join Date: 1st May 2006
Location: Surrey/Hants
Posts: 447
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
|
Quote:
If people choose to be dishonest and "front" It's the risk they take... until they hit someone else and find that their insurance is invalid and actually they are not covered and then the risk is ours...... because at the end of the day Fronting is almost the same level of risk as having no insurance at all. And since when has that been ok? I also have this tendency to call it when people tell "miss truths" on the internet to look good. No point in that. CP, cheers for the link. Wonder how the group 16 insurance is on that £30+k Merc is, compared to a 1.4 Civic that was too expensive without "Fronting" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) |
|
King of the rodeo
Civinfo guru
Join Date: 24th October 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 4,727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader: (0)
|
The whole thing reeks of BS to me.
I've insured myself on both cars thus far, worth it in the long run in terms of cost and NCB and the security of knowing I am covered full comp. 1.4 to 2.2 wasn't such a great hike with the 2years NCB I have and will set me up nicely for the future. |
|
|
|