![]() |
|
||
| This thread is about: To type "S" or to type "R" that is the question, it's in Buying, Dealers and Servicing at the Honda Civic forum Civinfo; If they would cost the same and you were Shakespeare which one would you by: Type R GT or Type S 2.2 i-cdti ? btw. ... | ||
| Help Search Stickers Surveys Wiki Forum |
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Type S 2.2 i-cdti or Type R GT | |||
| Type S 2.2 i-cdti |
|
27 | 42.19% |
| Type R GT |
|
37 | 57.81% |
| Voters: 64. You may not vote on this poll | Withdraw Vote | |||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Wheelnut
Join Date: 28th October 2006
Location: Croatia
Posts: 66
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
To type "S" or to type "R" that is the question
If they would cost the same and you were Shakespeare
btw. I have to warn you that I don't mean here in Type S that has extra options: different front and rear skirt, body colored all skirts and plastics on the bottom and blade alloys(whith all this it looks extra great) because with this options would cost few thousand euros more than Type R GT... |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Supporter
Triangular Exhaust
Join Date: 18th October 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 474
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I would really go for the fun (Type R) at this moment...
Not that I am saying Type S is no fun... But I love the sound of the R at high revs.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Valve Cap
Join Date: 6th December 2006
Location: Elgin, way up in Scotland!
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Type S 2.2 i-cdti
Type S 2.2 i-cdti, for me. Ive had a shot of a couple of various Type R models and always find it a bit "unnerving" that you have to rev so high to get going, where the 2.2 i-cdti just oozes torque from the word go.
Plus, remapped for an extra few hundred, and its seems mid-range pick up on the oil burner is better - it relates (to me) to be a more "useful" driving experience. PS. As far as I know (could be wrong) the Type S has the Type R's suspension setup too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Locking Wheelnut
Join Date: 7th December 2006
Location: Turriff
Posts: 196
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
If running costs weren't an issue, I wouldn't be driving a Civic. If they aren't and it's between the S and R, it'd be the Type R without doubt. If they are, and I had to choose, I'd take the Type S, which is why I drive one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Wheelnut
Join Date: 4th December 2006
Location: Just outside of Luton
Posts: 76
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
If ins. didn't kill me Type R,
Even though the 2.2 can be remapped, shouldn't be long before Type R goodies come out... But with my current life spent on the motorway and my insurance my 2.2 ES is great!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
King of the rodeo
Civinfo guru
Join Date: 24th October 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 4,500
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Tough choice, all things being equal it would have to be the R. It's like going to a restaraunt and only ordering half a meal (type-s), go the whole hog! That said insurance etc rules the type R out immediately for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Locking Wheelnut
Join Date: 7th December 2006
Location: Turriff
Posts: 196
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Diesel would still be down 15-20bhp and weigh more. In gear the chipped diesel would rock... but it'd never match the Type R for handling, braking or outright speed, whether in a straight line or around a track.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Super Moderator
Civinfo master
Join Date: 4th August 2006
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 5,638
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
hmmmm.... A chipped Diesel, with the (potentially!) same suspension set up as the R? Braking would be an issue though |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Supporter
Magic Rear Seat
Join Date: 27th June 2006
Location: Budapest
Posts: 509
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
An R GT for me. Although, if I had one I'd certainly rev it a bit more than this:
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/videos/...ic_type_r.html Talk about Sunday driver. That chap couldn't stir a fondue properly, let alone the Type R's gearbox!! Last edited by jayt43; 8th February 2007 at 20:11. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
Civinfo master
Join Date: 10th April 2006
Location: Leics
Posts: 5,039
Thanks: 13
Thanked 95 Times in 50 Posts
|
Quote:
Performance / gearing comparison between EP3 and FN2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Locking Wheelnut
Join Date: 23rd January 2007
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I was in the same boat 3 weeks ago before we ordered our new car.
The things that swayed our decision to go Type 'S' was fuel consumption, insurance and the unwanted attention of owning a Type 'R' again. The increased overall running costs were not worth the additional extras you'd gain from a type 'R' (top speed and handling, seats to name a few) and since the colours were boring, no yellow or white options. So we decided type 'S' GT sticking with the 2.2 diesel to be our new civic. |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Phone Blackberry 8300 "Curve" %£$'~@^ pairing with Bluetooth | BlacknBlue | Electronics | 7 | 30th October 2007 15:25 |
| Tyre Choice Warning! "Fake" tyres being sold (including Goodyear F1) | Pottsy | Wheels, Tyres, Suspension and Brakes | 16 | 5th October 2007 11:43 |
| Used type r "s" not selling on ebay | stewy123 | Buying, Dealers and Servicing | 10 | 26th September 2007 18:26 |
| Satnav "No DVD Disc Installed. Please Check System." Error message | BobTheLoveGoat | Electronics | 2 | 30th March 2007 20:28 |
| TYPE "S" 3 Door Civic | jayt43 | General Discussion | 10 | 29th June 2006 21:04 |