![]() |
|
||
| This thread is about: First taste of Civic VTEC - You can keep it!, it's in Engines and Transmission at the Honda Civic forum Civinfo; Originally Posted by IGGY Civic DIESELS are for old men who cannot be bothered with the whole needing to drive or no about your cars ... | ||
| Help Rules Search Stickers Surveys Wiki Forum |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
Supporter
Magic Rear Seat
Join Date: 5th October 2006
Location: Romford, Essex
Posts: 898
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader: (0)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Triangular Exhaust
Join Date: 29th June 2007
Location: Swindon
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
iTrader: (0)
|
Iggy
Slow down mate - it's OK to be passioante about your car but no need to cast insults at the many (young&older) civic diesel drivers on this site. As for you assumptions about the relative pace I can assure you that a 2.2 civic woops a 2.2 accord - and as an ex race team manager I know how to get the best out of a car -I get it regular in my area as an Acc iCDTi driver surrounded by the Honda factory boys and I can't keep up with them on the straight in their 2.2 but but the 1.8 eats my dust. Also the Civic 2.2 is the car of choice for many of the young guys at the factory so it is not an age issue. I can also assure you it's not a matter of thinking, it's a fact, the 2.2 in the Civic is faster then the 1.8 straight line or real driving. Check the stats. And at the end of the day you do only have a single cam iVtec not a TWIN CAM VTEC I'd take a T/C VTEC over a TDi any day but also I'd take the TDi over the S/C i-Vtec |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Smell My Cheese!
Rocketship door handle
Join Date: 17th May 2006
Location: Bicester, Oxfordshire
Posts: 1,847
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader: (0)
|
*takes a step back and hides in the shadows*
Iggy, does somebody need a hug? And I don't mean to be pedantic but the 2.0 Type R needs more than air and fuel, it needs a source of ignition, surely you remember the fire triangle. Now Diesels, they only need air and fuel, they rely on compression ignition to create the bang. Sorry to those of you who no about engines. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Supporter
Wheelnut
|
I did not mean the thread to be an agressive one ! I was just trying to get the factor across that you cannot compare any deisel with a Vtec.
I also appologise if i offended people of the older generation it was just a personal quote. Due to fact majority of the older generation drive diesels and dont stop going on about the price of fuel and how much does your car get to mpg etc. Thanks greedy i know what i drive ! And the diesel is olny 0.3 sec quicker only in a straight line your supspension will not take it on the lanes well it will but no where near an s/r and i personly think you would have to be quick off the line to get it right you being an ex racing manager etc most probably will but not people can it right of the mark !! |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
King of the rodeo
Civinfo guru
Join Date: 24th October 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 4,724
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
iTrader: (0)
|
First Iggy You have made several factual (as well as grammatical errors),
The 2.2 IS faster and more powerful than the 1.8. FACT. The 2.2 can have as much as 148-150bhp standard as opposed to the 138bhp with the petrol. "2.2 civic is rubbish for old lazy men." I don't know where you got that from? I am neither old nor lazy, just enjoy the surge in power. The 2.2 can be easily chipped or remapped to as much as 180/190bhp. Your 1.8 will always remain 138bhp without expensive modifications. And even the stock 2.2 would beat your petrol in a drag race. You obviously prefer the petrol, fair enough, but it is slower than the diesel, less flexible and has less potential to go faster. I'll stick with diesel thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
Locking Wheelnut
Join Date: 20th April 2007
Location: South Yorkshire
Posts: 182
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader: (0)
|
The 1.8 ivtec is a very clever engine that leaves many manufacturers behind. Lets not forget it was developed with economy in mind, and not power, for a 1.8 44mpg real world figures is class leading and when you want some power it's there, albeit at 5k rpm.
I find most turbo diesels to be a very relaxing drive but when you do push on I don't like how the power just disappears altogether. I certainly wouldn't swap mine for a diesel even if it is only a SHOC. Each to his own. If this SOHC i-vtec petrol engine had another 400cc would it be faster than the 2.2 diesel ? Probably |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) |
|
Supporter
Magic Rear Seat
Join Date: 19th March 2007
Location: EASTBOURNE
Posts: 872
Thanks: 1
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
iTrader: (0)
|
Diesel v Petrol
The diesel v petrol "discussion" could go on for ever however point that has`nt been brought up is simply thar Honda restrict your choice simply because the do not offer a choice of auto or manual gearboxes on any of the diesels in any of the ranges.We origionally wanted an i-shift diesel as we always buy auto cars but found that you could`nt have one so we had petrol the point being that honda must be losing sales as most competitors offer the option
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
|
Magic Rear Seat
Join Date: 5th September 2006
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 850
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader: (0)
|
I think there are no winners in this discussion. The diesel has a turbo for power, the petrol has Vtec for economy, chalk and cheese really. The diesel compared to the R-type seems a better contest to me, and a better match wrt engine price.
Last edited by pcr; 1st September 2007 at 12:06. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) |
|
Valve Cap
Join Date: 10th February 2007
Location: Renfrewshire
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
|
Engine
MAN B&WModel11K90MC-C Type 2-Stroke Engine Power 66,398 hp Now this is what I call a diesel!!!!!!!!! all you petrol heads out there...a diesel will always produce more power either in 2 stroke (low RPM) or 4 stroke (low & high speed). |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) |
|
Valve Cap
Join Date: 12th May 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 34
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
|
Our local dealer service manager (not old by any means!) rates the 2.2 diesel far higher than the BOF 1.8 or even the Type R. Revs in a car are tedious for the long term, but the max of the 1.8 is still shopping trolley territory
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) |
|
Supporter
Locking Wheelnut
|
at the moment im driving a courtesy car diesel type s 547 miles on the clock , as others have said the diesel engine is quite superb but i still prefer the 1.8 petrol .
if i wanted to save some money on fuel i would have purchased a diesel (or would i) the price difference inbetween the type s and the type sd would take some recouping in fuel savings alone , i am currently averaging 41.2 mpg in the petrol and im not a lightright,the courtesy car is returning 47.7mpg so not much difference , if you read all the forums the diesel is eating tyres and brake pads a lot quicker than the petrol (this is the case with all td cars versus their petrol counterparts.Both the diesel and the petrol put a smile on my face even the 1.4 when broken in revs for fun and is great around town. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) | |
|
..with Superchips please!
Triangular Exhaust
Join Date: 29th July 2006
Location: Ringwood
Posts: 337
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader: (0)
|
Quote:
Enough guys! Surely one of the reasons there is both a VTEC and a diesel option is that there's more than one type of driver (leaving marketing reasons aside!) - and I don't buy the 'old man' image of current diesel cars either, as although I'm now on my sixth decade I've competed in both circuit racing and rallying at both national and international level and it ain't out of my system yet - I get a real hit out of using a car somewhere close to its maximum where and when I can (not always to the amusement of my passenger!). There is a reason diesel engine R&D is producing great driving experiences in current cars and it hinges around enviromental/political issues - the governments in both the UK and elsewhere have and are putting their weight behind biofuel alternatives to current petrol blends because they have to be seen to be doing something, but it is a sham!! The engine designers of the world know better and are putting their money on diesel engines until something better is viable. I have the misfortune to be intimately involved in the design and construction of one of the very large plants currently being designed (for a company called B*) to produce the petrol that has to be sold to us from Jan 1st 2010, and I can tell you that that the fuel will be c**p - way less efficient as fuel, so your tank of petrol ain't going to go anywhere near as many miles, plus the fact that the plant that produces it will exhaust close to 41 tonnes of CO2/hour in the act of producing it......... One of the great experiences of my life was owning two Lancia Delta Integrales (don't know it? - look it up!!!) - good old fashioned petrolhead automotive engineering at its best - quicker than any Ferrari cross country - but forget it, the petrol engine has a limited life in current form, and also forget the prejudices about diesels until something more acceptable comes along -like it or not, diesel engines is, and will be where it's at for a while yet....... ...and, if my bosses see this - I'm sacked!! |
|
|
|
|