Civinfo

1.jpg
This thread is about: FN2 Performance ECU now available, it's in Type-R at the Honda Civic forum Civinfo; Originally Posted by Marvintheandroid Yea I agree with Reaver and the points he raises. Im all for boasting the midrange as I also find it ...

Help Rules Search Stickers Surveys Wiki Forum
Go Back   Civinfo > Honda Civic > Type-R

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15th January 2008, 13:05   #41 (permalink)
Cap
Triangular Exhaust
 
Cap's Avatar
 
Join Date: 8th August 2007
Location: Oslo, Norway NO
Posts: 231
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvintheandroid View Post
Yea I agree with Reaver and the points he raises.

Im all for boasting the midrange as I also find it a little lacking (compared to a 2.0TDi for instance), but I think the chip must have a negative effect on fuel economy?

Also with the vtec coming on sooner surely this will invalid ** engine warranty etc?

And to re-iterate, why didnt honda use this chip in the first place? There must be a negative?
Ofcourse there is a negative, as you say or Honda would have done it originally...

1. You raise the rev limiter, wich will make you able to rev higher, reducing the lifetime of your engine slightly depending how often you hit the limit.

2. You will most likely have more fuel consumption (due to lowered vtec limit and reprogrammed fuel injection). I saw a ref of 10l/100km on moded, and thats about 1-2l more....


If you dont care about neither and the fact that your car is easier to steal, go fetch one!
Cap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2008, 21:52   #42 (permalink)
Locking Wheelnut
 
miniturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 13th August 2007
Location: Hassocks nr Brighton
Posts: 108
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cap View Post
Ofcourse there is a negative, as you say or Honda would have done it originally...

1. You raise the rev limiter, wich will make you able to rev higher, reducing the lifetime of your engine slightly depending how often you hit the limit.

2. You will most likely have more fuel consumption (due to lowered vtec limit and reprogrammed fuel injection). I saw a ref of 10l/100km on moded, and thats about 1-2l more....


If you dont care about neither and the fact that your car is easier to steal, go fetch one!
i can assure you that fuel eco is really un affected under normal driving it could even be improved, there is far less need to change gear if your driving your 200bhp car with saving fuel in mind.
miniturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2008, 22:17   #43 (permalink)
HACKIN & SLAYIN
Civinfo guru
 
illegalhunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10th May 2007
Location: In the woods armed to the teeth SCOTLAND
Posts: 2,891
Thanks: 6
Thanked 35 Times in 34 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Why cant we get the the FD2 ecu map for the FN2
illegalhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2008, 07:54   #44 (permalink)
Cap
Triangular Exhaust
 
Cap's Avatar
 
Join Date: 8th August 2007
Location: Oslo, Norway NO
Posts: 231
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by illegalhunter View Post
Why cant we get the the FD2 ecu map for the FN2
I dont think that its only the ECU map that gives the FD2`s extra 25HP...
The engine is modded aswell, flywheel, inlet, exhaust manifoild etc..
Cap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2008, 09:44   #45 (permalink)
Wheelnut
 
lozhoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 22nd July 2007
Posts: 67
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
i saw somewhere its a completley different engine, might be wrong
lozhoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2008, 01:05   #46 (permalink)
i-VTEC Junkie
Locking Wheelnut
 
charlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: 29th January 2008
Location: Leics/Warwick GB
Posts: 159
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
iTrader: (0)
The engines are pretty much the same in essence.

The Jap K20A has slight differences though, 11.7:1 compression being the biggest change compaired to the Euro K20Z4 11:1 ratio.

The Euro engine can be tweaked upto the Jap one without too much issue, just the wear rate and the difference in proposed lifetime of the two different markets that probably calls for the changes.
charlas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2008, 09:11   #47 (permalink)
Locking Wheelnut
 
gjackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: 5th February 2008
Location: West Yorks ENGLAND
Posts: 124
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
iTrader: (0)
I'm surprised any insurance company has covered you for disabling the immobiliser.
gjackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2008, 10:53   #48 (permalink)
Wheelnut
 
Join Date: 12th July 2007
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
I bet his insurance company doesnt know ... dont think o would bother telling mine if you can just swap the chip out...

Would be right in saying that you have to fit the chip youself then ? is it hard to get too ? how long to fit ?

Definatley tempted...
montymole1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2008, 12:53   #49 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Civinfo master
 
TTDegs's Avatar
 
Join Date: 4th August 2006
Location: Cardiff WALES
Posts: 5,638
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by montymole1 View Post
I bet his insurance company doesnt know
I slightly sweeping statement!...


Quote:
... dont think o would bother telling mine if you can just swap the chip out...
I wouldn't recommend that...

"so sir, you reported your car stolen? And we paid out? Well the good news is that it has been recovered The bad news is that we have discovered that the immobiliser wasn't working - and that was due to the un-disclosed hondata performance chip We'll see you in court, and don't expect to ever get insurance on anything at all in the future - including your car, your life or your house or contents. Thank you, goodbye "
TTDegs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2008, 14:37   #50 (permalink)
Wheelnut
 
Join Date: 12th July 2007
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
hmm good point.. perhaps i didnt quite think it through... lol

i guess the the insurance barstewards...would ramp up the price...as soon as you mention the work chip !
montymole1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2008, 14:50   #51 (permalink)
Supporter
Locking Wheelnut
 
philiphenderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: 6th September 2007
Location: Tyne and Wear ENGLAND
Posts: 125
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Where is the chip fitted? Could someone wanting to steal the car more easily replace it?

Phil.
philiphenderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2008, 16:20   #52 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Civinfo master
 
TTDegs's Avatar
 
Join Date: 4th August 2006
Location: Cardiff WALES
Posts: 5,638
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by montymole1 View Post
hmm good point.. perhaps i didnt quite think it through... lol

i guess the the insurance barstewards...would ramp up the price...as soon as you mention the work chip !
you might be surprised...

Although I think the extra performance would be less of an issue than the dis-functioning immobiliser
TTDegs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2008, 16:22   #53 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Civinfo master
 
TTDegs's Avatar
 
Join Date: 4th August 2006
Location: Cardiff WALES
Posts: 5,638
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by philiphenderson View Post
Where is the chip fitted? Could someone wanting to steal the car more easily replace it?

Phil.
on the grounds of "what performance chip? Those gits who stole it must have fitted it!"?
TTDegs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2008, 10:32   #54 (permalink)
Locking Wheelnut
 
gjackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: 5th February 2008
Location: West Yorks ENGLAND
Posts: 124
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TTDegs View Post
on the grounds of "what performance chip? Those gits who stole it must have fitted it!"?
If thats your tact ensure you pay cash for it don't have it delivered to an address that you can be associated to, don't mention it on forums and remove all identifying indicators from it so even the manufacturers can't tell the ins company where when and to whom it was sold.

With the right insurance company the performance gains would have little impact on the premium though by disabling the immobilzer I'd be surprised if any would actually insure you against theft.

It's a nice expensive car to be taking that risk on.
gjackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2008, 14:26   #55 (permalink)
Nobody gets out alive
Rocketship door handle
 
NEEMSTAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: 7th October 2007
Location: In your mind ENGLAND
Posts: 1,380
Thanks: 30
Thanked 24 Times in 24 Posts
iTrader: (0)
i agree about the insurance companies being reluctant however like someone has mentioned before most 'new' cars are stolen WITH the key and also if you have blackjax they are not going to get very far, but insurance companies don't understand this , they are only out for money especially off youngsters.
NEEMSTAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd February 2008, 16:36   #56 (permalink)
Locking Wheelnut
 
civic_jaso's Avatar
 
Join Date: 4th March 2007
Location: newport
Posts: 110
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gjackson View Post
I'm surprised any insurance company has covered you for disabling the immobiliser.
i just spoke to my insurance direct line, told them of my modifications and made it very clear that the new ecu makes my immobiliser redundant,told them twice it will have no immobiliser,but i will be fitting a toad cat 2.
there was a reply of doesn't matter we are not calling for an immobiliser on the system so up to you if you want to fit one,and i will make a small note on the system that you have one installed.

i even spoke to a police traffic officer who came into my shop,he said it's down to the discretion of your insurance supplier.
you can only go on what they say.
civic_jaso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008, 01:00   #57 (permalink)
Valve Cap
 
Join Date: 5th December 2007
Location: Moskow,Russia RU
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Reflash - Euro 07 Civic Type R
Vladd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008, 10:21   #58 (permalink)
Nobody gets out alive
Rocketship door handle
 
NEEMSTAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: 7th October 2007
Location: In your mind ENGLAND
Posts: 1,380
Thanks: 30
Thanked 24 Times in 24 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vladd View Post
the temptation is killing me
NEEMSTAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008, 16:09   #59 (permalink)
Supporter
Valve Cap
 
andreyka123's Avatar
 
Join Date: 17th September 2007
Location: St.Petersburg, Russia
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vladd View Post
Yes, thanks for the source link.
andreyka123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008, 16:49   #60 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Civinfo master
 
TTDegs's Avatar
 
Join Date: 4th August 2006
Location: Cardiff WALES
Posts: 5,638
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader: (0)
does look rather tasty

'only' 10 ponies at the top, but that nice big lump of torque in the middle...

No mention of the immobiliser though, which the old version unfortunately disabled?
TTDegs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Civinfo > Honda Civic > Type-R

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads for: FN2 Performance ECU now available
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[HOW TO] Modify the EX HFT for better microphone performance WonkySights How To 62 21st November 2007 21:40
Performance / gearing comparison between EP3 and FN2 Pottsy Type-R 11 8th August 2007 12:15
Performance Theoretical performance figures Pottsy Engines and Transmission 7 23rd December 2006 08:01
Tuning Performance Modifications?