![]() |
|
||
| This thread is about: replace or rotate? (split posts), it's in Wheels, Tyres, Suspension and Brakes at the Honda Civic forum Civinfo; my front (18") Mich PS2s lasted about 12K miles rears are virtually untouched though Now got Goodyears on the front To early to say how ... | ||
| Help Search Stickers Surveys Wiki Forum |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
Civinfo master
Join Date: 4th August 2006
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 5,638
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
replace or rotate? (split posts)
my front (18") Mich PS2s lasted about 12K miles
rears are virtually untouched though Now got Goodyears on the front I would say though, that the advice above are for relatively 'softer' tyres - ie more grip, but less mileage. Which for me personally, is the way to go But I can understand people who are looking for harder, longer wearing tyres |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Supporter
Magic Rear Seat
Join Date: 3rd December 2006
Location: Renfrewshire
Posts: 504
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Tyres
Quote:
I recommend the ps2's. Last edited by alastair b; 16th March 2007 at 17:05. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Super Moderator
Civinfo master
Join Date: 4th August 2006
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 5,638
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
On the down side, company car = due to having to work my 'arris off to get the job that got the car, = no spare time to worry about changing tyres around (see the times of 90% of my posts in here (and no, that's not me asking or looking for a sympathy vote LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Super Moderator
Civinfo master
Join Date: 4th August 2006
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 5,638
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
to be honest though, whilst I can appreciate that there are benefits to tyre rotation, eventually you will have to replace them at some point. Lets say fronts last 12K and rears 36K. And set tyre price at £150 each (just for round numbers). Costs below are running totals Option 1 - no rotation, replace as worn out 12K - 2 x front £300 24K - 2 x front £600 36K - 2 x front + 2 x rear £1200 48K - 2 x front £1500 60K - 2 x front £1800 72K - 2 x front + 2 x rear £2400 Option 2 - rotate back to front when worn out. Assume 10K left in tyres @ move 12K - move back to front + 2 rear £300 22K - move back to front + 2 rear £600 32K - move back to front + 2 rear £900 42K - move back to front + 2 rear £1200 52K - move back to front + 2 rear £1500 62K - move back to front + 2 rear £1800 72K - move back to front + 2 rear £2100 so you've saved £300 and if you're doing the average 12K miles per year, that's £300 over 6 years. which is about £5 per month. and it assumes (probably correctly) that the tyre fitter will rotate the wheels for free when replacing the rears. If they charge you £10 for rotating tho, that's £70 gone from your £300 saving |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Magic Rear Seat
Join Date: 5th September 2006
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 832
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
TTDegs,
Well there's nothing on TV just now so excuse this sad response. I'm sure rotating tyres cannot save money as you describe, I think your figures are off. Why assume there is 10K left on rears at first rotation, I would have thought 8K ? Seriously though, isn't the point of rotating tyres more to do with keeping good tyres on the front for longer? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Triangular Exhaust
Join Date: 22nd July 2006
Location: Lynemouth, Northumberland
Posts: 421
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thanks for your recommendations peeps. can we please keep it about what i am asking though and not get into a debate between yourselves about it, thats why the other tyre threads got confusing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Fallen Angel
Rocketship door handle
Join Date: 16th October 2006
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Andrea..we are not going off topic..actually we think..that is me and CZ ( hope u don't mind me speaking for u) think it is really great the TT has gone to all that trouble..personally i would have taken it to a garage and got them to replace what was already on my car!!
Don't jump to conclusions we are recognising the hard work of one of the key members of the site |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Wheelnut
Join Date: 7th January 2007
Location: Swindon
Posts: 95
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
agreeing with SJ on the aforementioned post...people are helping each other out and highlighting there good will isnt a bad thing, should be commended more often...as it should be with everything!
http://www.mytyres.co.uk/start.html try here! Last edited by Power_of_Dreams; 17th March 2007 at 23:03. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Triangular Exhaust
Join Date: 22nd July 2006
Location: Lynemouth, Northumberland
Posts: 421
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
All im after is some recommendations, not for people to debate if rotating tyres is better than buying 4 new ones. and the post wasnt referring to you anyway SJ. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | ||
|
Super Moderator
Civinfo master
Join Date: 4th August 2006
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 5,638
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
I went for 10K left because: When I replace my front MPS2, at 12K, the tyres on the back still had over 6mm of tread left, from 7mm when new (they were hardly touched) Replacing at 3mm, meant 4mm of tread had been used in 12Kmiles so 1mm of tread = 3K miles At over 6mm left on the rears, that would have meant 3+ times 3K miles, which gave me 10K left Plus, 10K was a nice round number, which helped Quote:
But that got a bit toooooo confusing for me to try and work out the costs for I might have a go later |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Supporter
Magic Rear Seat
Join Date: 2nd February 2007
Location: Gloucester
Posts: 645
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I always put the rears to the front & replace the rears... only 2 tyres to buy at any 1 time. Before I did this I used to replace whatever was worn out without rotation & ended up with the back tyres rotting before the tread had worn...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Supporter
Rocketship door handle
Join Date: 12th June 2006
Location: Reading, Berks
Posts: 1,046
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Supporter
Magic Rear Seat
Join Date: 3rd December 2006
Location: Renfrewshire
Posts: 504
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
tyres
Quote:
Keep up the good work. Sorry Andrea. Last edited by alastair b; 19th March 2007 at 12:53. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
Civinfo master
Join Date: 4th August 2006
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 5,638
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
ok.
time to bite the bullet and try to do the numbers with half worn rotations... *gulp* First up, some assumptions: tyres on the front wear at a rate of 1mm = 3K miles tyres on the back wear at a rate of 1mm = 12k miles tyres start with 7mm of tread rotate tyres when front tread gets to 5mm ish replace tyres at 3mm pair of tyres = £300 6K - front = 2mm wear, down to 5mm. rear = 0.5mm wear, down to 6.5mm. rotate. front now 6.5mm, rear 5mm. cost to date £0 12K - front = 2mm wear, down to 4.5mm. rear = 0.5mm wear, down to 4.5mm. no point in doing anything. cost to date £0 16.5k - front 1.5mm wear, down to 3mm. rear = 0.4mm wear, down to 4.1mm. replace fronts. front now 7mm, rear 4.1mm. cost to date £300 22.5K - front = 2mm wear, down to 5mm. rear = 0.5mm wear, down to 3.6mm. no change. cost to date £300 28.5K - front = 2mm wear, down to 3mm. rear = 0.5mm wear, down to 3.1mm. replace front and rear. front now 7mm, rear 7mm. cost to date £900 So, we're back to exactly where we started - new rubber all round, and we're at 28.5K miles. double that distance, to save some typing 57k - front now 7mm, rear now 7mm. cost to date £1800 63K - front = 2mm wear, down to 5mm. rear = 0.5mm wear, down to 6.5mm. rotate. front now 6.5mm, rear 5mm. cost to date £1800 69K - front = 2mm wear, down to 4.5mm. rear = 0.5mm wear, down to 4.5mm. no point in doing anything. cost to date £1800 73.5k - front 1.5mm wear, down to 3mm. rear = 0.4mm wear, down to 4.1mm. replace fronts. front now 7mm, rear 4.1mm. cost to date £2100 so. In option1, we did no rotating at all. at 72K, we had paid out £2400, and had new tyres all round In option2, we moved the back ones to the front when the fronts wore out. at 72K, we had paid out £2100, and had new tyres up front, and virtually new ones at the back. In option3, we rotated the tyres when they hit 5mm, and replaced at 3mm. at 73.5k, we had paid out £2100, and had new tyres up front, but fairly worn ones (4.1mm left) at the back. please feel free to spot any mistakes! (or work out what happens if you rotate ever 3K miles |
|
|
|