New 9th. Civic vs new Subaru Impreza/XV - Civinfo
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 13 (permalink) Old 6th March 2012, 11:53 Thread Starter
 
Car: 2006 Suzuki Swift 1.3 AMT
Join Date: 10th February 2012
Location: Denmark DK
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader: (0)
New 9th. Civic vs new Subaru Impreza/XV

Hi all,

Now, given this is a Honda forum I now I cannot expect the replies to be totally objective. Nevertheless, I would like your opinion on this matter.

As you may have readsometime in 13 or 14, I'll be in the market for a new car.
I'm considering the cars mentioned. Originally, I'd ditched Subaru because they are very expensive. However, I like the AWD on them, and since it will be a family car, the wife agrees that AWD would be a nice safety feature.

I'm no "race guy" by any means, hence, 0-62 aren't that important to me. My current Swift 1.3 does this "sprint in around 12,3 secs, and that's fast enough for me.

Due to the high prices on Subarus I will have to settle for the newly engineered 1.6 petrol. It's not a fast car/engine combination by any means (13.8 secs from 0-62 with the CVT, which I need). However, the MPGs of this AWD car is now slightly better than that of the 2012 1.8 civic A/T, which I think is good considering the AWD!

What's more, in the Danish reviews, the 1.6/CVT combi is praised as a "good match between economy (MPGs) and power because, whilst the displacement is quite small, this little engine is described as delivering decent low down torque (for a 1.6, that is).

Now, a newly designed engine may be a reason to worry. Subaru's boxer diesel turned out to have a lot of "teething problems", however, I haven't heard of any real problems with the petrol (2.0), and from now and two year forward, I guess potential problems with the new 1.6 will have revealed themselves.

Subaru 1.6 pros:

AWD (permanent safety feature AND a bit more capable although I don't see myself going of road very often. In the winter time AWD will be awesome though).
MPGs same as comparable non AWD cars.
Best child protection ever tested in NCAP.
Overall, Subarus are known to be quality.

Subaru 1.6 cons:

Slow accelration (13.8 secs.)
"Only" 380 litres of boot space. (Although we will live with 200 litres the swift has to offer from our son is infant to two years old)
New engine (Teething problems)
Small dealer network in Denmark (although from May we'll be living just 8 ks from a dealer.
Expensive service (I think.)
and the big one: the Subaru costs 33% more than the civic and has less equipment as standard (not even cd/radio, cruise control via steering wheel and electric folding mirrors).


But I'm worried about the Quality of the new Civic, the dealer network is small too.

What do you think?
nicolaidenmark is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 13 (permalink) Old 6th March 2012, 12:20
 
Join Date: 22nd October 2011
Location: Gloucester, UK ENGLAND
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader: (0)
Hey,

AWD isn't really a great "safety" feature. My mate owns a subaru wrx and he says it is really bad on snow and ice and thats at slow speeds.
So if this is a big part of your choice read this below.

4WD/AWD systems provide some but not much added safety! Only the convenience, that you don't have spinning tires when starting - or the convenience to get started where a 2WD would not be able to get going. Or the convenience to get up a snowy pass without spinning tires or without mounting chains.
However, once moving the physics for all vehicles are equal. 1WD, 2WD, 4WD, 6WD etc.

All motor vehicles need traction for safe steering -
4WD/AWD does not provide extra traction for steering.

All cars need traction for safe braking - 4WD/AWD does not provide extra traction for braking.


In that sense 2WD is "safer" - it leaves you stranded early and keeps you out of trouble. The trouble only 4WD/AWD owners might get into.
Lucusade is offline  
post #3 of 13 (permalink) Old 6th March 2012, 12:27 Thread Starter
** Thread starter **
 
Car: 2006 Suzuki Swift 1.3 AMT
Join Date: 10th February 2012
Location: Denmark DK
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader: (0)
well, the Subaru AWD moves traction to the wheels that have grip. an ordinary 2 wheel drive car does not, hence, AWD makes sure you always have the most traction possible.

Don't forget: you should still use winter tyres on a Subaru!

Check this out:

nicolaidenmark is offline  
 
post #4 of 13 (permalink) Old 6th March 2012, 12:51
Civinfo Wind Up Merchant
 
Scotty182's Avatar
 
Car: V'9 STI
Join Date: 24th July 2010
Location: Manchester, UK ENGLAND
Posts: 2,472
Thanks: 24
Thanked 242 Times in 222 Posts
iTrader: (4)
Send a message via MSN to Scotty182
All motor vehicles need traction for safe steering - 4WD/AWD does not provide extra traction for steering.
Not strictly true... The 4wd system in a subaru is brilliantly designed. The added grip round a 'testing' corner by a 4wd car is unbelievable, it's gives a sense of 'pulling' you in the direction at which you aim, assuming your still in control of the vehicle..
And so long as you drive within the limits of yourself and the vehicle, 4wd system suffer less under or over steer than fwd/rwd respectively

All cars need traction for safe braking - 4WD/AWD does not provide extra traction for braking.

If you take into account engine braking it does, jumping on the brakes without dipping the clutch; the engine with aid bring all four wheels to a stop


IMO, 4wd is a great safety feature, especially if the area you live suffers in the winter from ice & snow
Scotty182 is offline  
post #5 of 13 (permalink) Old 6th March 2012, 13:27
 
gjackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: 5th February 2008
Location: North Yorks ENGLAND
Posts: 716
Thanks: 13
Thanked 64 Times in 61 Posts
iTrader: (0)
I'm yet to see a car fitted with a CVT box get anywhere near the official fuel figures, so I would say wait a while or take one out to see how close you can get.
gjackson is offline  
post #6 of 13 (permalink) Old 6th March 2012, 21:04 Thread Starter
** Thread starter **
 
Car: 2006 Suzuki Swift 1.3 AMT
Join Date: 10th February 2012
Location: Denmark DK
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader: (0)
I'll see what happens when this models has a couple of years under its belt. I'm very wary though. They are expensive and equipment levels are poor. Also, the reliability of Subarus is not what it once was. Albeit still quite good. I read many long term tests (Auto Bild, Germany) and they actually had a Kia Ceed score good points after 100,000 ks.
So don't really know what to believe about reliability anymore. It seems you can find a statistic that will be to your liking regardless of what cars you like!
nicolaidenmark is offline  
post #7 of 13 (permalink) Old 11th March 2012, 11:15
 
Join Date: 17th September 2009
Location: Estonia EE
Posts: 58
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Buy a Subaru. It's good.
ksuuk is offline  
post #8 of 13 (permalink) Old 11th March 2012, 12:16
Arfurs right hand man
 
NH Dan's Avatar
 
Car: 1.8 Civic SE plus Auto 9th G
Join Date: 31st January 2008
Location: South London,Uk GB
Posts: 4,125
Thanks: 559
Thanked 476 Times in 380 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by gjackson View Post
I'm yet to see a car fitted with a CVT box get anywhere near the official fuel figures, so I would say wait a while or take one out to see how close you can get.
You're right. i've been driving an auto jazz lately and it BETTER than the quoted figures!
NH Dan is offline  
post #9 of 13 (permalink) Old 11th March 2012, 17:36 Thread Starter
** Thread starter **
 
Car: 2006 Suzuki Swift 1.3 AMT
Join Date: 10th February 2012
Location: Denmark DK
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader: (0)
Well, Subaru seems to be conservative regarding MPGs.

Kussuk: have you tried a Subaru from 2008 and -> ?
nicolaidenmark is offline  
post #10 of 13 (permalink) Old 11th March 2012, 21:06 Thread Starter
** Thread starter **
 
Car: 2006 Suzuki Swift 1.3 AMT
Join Date: 10th February 2012
Location: Denmark DK
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader: (0)
It's just that with an XV/Impreza i would have to compromise with regards to acceleration and trim level and boot space. In return I would get AWD.
nicolaidenmark is offline  
post #11 of 13 (permalink) Old 11th March 2012, 21:17
FWH
Supporter
 
FWH's Avatar
 
Car: MX-5, C6 Vette & MB S212
Join Date: 3rd June 2007
Location: Where Polar Bears roam the streets SE
Posts: 22,623
Thanks: 558
Thanked 1,029 Times in 772 Posts
iTrader: (1)
The Subarus I have driven in the winter (with good studded Hakka tyres) have had excellent traction and handling in the snow.

However, it's not often that I have really been stuck with 2WD, so I don't think I would trade space, trim level and acceleration for 4WD.



FWH is offline  
post #12 of 13 (permalink) Old 23rd March 2012, 06:56
 
Car: 2008 1.8 i-vtec sport
Join Date: 30th August 2011
Location: Finland FI
Posts: 56
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
iTrader: (0)
i would take the AWD but just because i live in Finland and we get a lot of snow in the winter. my civic was stuck 3 times last winter. it wasnt fun
eaglerock is offline  
post #13 of 13 (permalink) Old 23rd March 2012, 07:51
Helpee
 
RobCDTi's Avatar
 
Car: 2007 i-CTDi
Join Date: 26th August 2009
Location: Wolverhampton ENGLAND
Posts: 126
Thanks: 7
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
iTrader: (0)
I went from a Subaru Impreza to a Civic. I had the Impreza for 5 years, no problems, well built and reliable. Only changed for economy (Mine was a WRX).

Nothing is good on ice, but the Subaru was great on snow. It had no traction control though (maybe the new one does?) and I find the traction control excellent on the Civic, but AWD is always going to be better.
RobCDTi is offline  
Reply

  Civinfo > 9th Generation Euro Honda Civic (2012 - 2016) > General Discussion (9G)

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Civinfo forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Your User Name is the name that appears by all your posts on the forum, and so should not be your email address.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Impreza Turbo to Civic? MrRee General Discussion (8G) 307 12th March 2011 00:55

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome