2006+ Honda Civic Forum banner

1 - 18 of 18 Posts

·
Troll Apparrently
Joined
·
981 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
had the Ron the rolling road this morning and it made
196.2bhp @ wheels
210.8 bhp @ engine
145lbft torque

happy with these figures. needless to say a few heads were turned lol

picture of my graph and that. will have a hd video link up soon
 

Attachments

·
Civinfo's Bulb Supplier
Joined
·
13,427 Posts
had the Ron the rolling road this morning and it made
196.2bhp @ wheels
210.8 bhp @ engine
145lbft torque

happy with these figures. needless to say a few heads were turned lol

picture of my graph and that. will have a hd video link up soon

196HP at the wheels is more like 235BHP at flywheel so I don't know what's happened there!

My S2000 got 190WHP before I sold it :eek:
 

·
Civinfo's Bulb Supplier
Joined
·
13,427 Posts
Serious jp? wow wolud love to have that sorta power. i dont know whats happened.
I can't make it out TBH, graph curve and integrity look spot on, but the power at the wheels is not correct at all, which is weird because roller load cell dyno's take wheel power then do the conversion to flywheel power, so if anything the WHP should be spot on (around 175WHP)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
610 Posts
Transmission losses are about 15-18% on FWD cars.;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
610 Posts

·
Civinfo's Bulb Supplier
Joined
·
13,427 Posts
Backs up your point that wheel figure is to high
Got ya ;)

Made me feel insecure I'd said something wrong :)

Sam, whatever has happened the 210BHP figure it's come up with is what the graph shows and that's very respectable, so you should be happy, how it's got there though I don't know :D
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
610 Posts
Had 3 totally stock cars in over the last few weeks including one sent up by Honda UK for testing and all made 208-210. Seems to be the norm when you look at other cars being tested around europe. ;)
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
2,573 Posts
196 for mine [stock] also but on a hub Dynapack!

i've seen the graph and the run was on 4th gear ....why not 5th which is more close to 1:1 on the final drive?

my run was on 5th!
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
335 Posts
212.8 standard from mine,need to dig out the graph,sure it was mid 180`s at wheels.were four fn`s on the day ranging from 198 to 212.8,some with filters,or catbacks,or both.the way they get driven and the fuel used definately seems to help!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
610 Posts
Very little difference between 4th and 5th just that 5th gives longer run thus giving more samples so more accuate tuning.
1st would give exactly same power but run would be over in a second.
 
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
Top