2006+ Honda Civic Forum banner

Buying Experience 1.6 SR Civic 10th Gen & 8th Gen Accord from Holdcroft Honda Stoke

1 reading
21K views 88 replies 18 participants last post by  Azzaaaaaaa  
#1 ·
Buying Experience 1.6 SR Civic 10th Gen & 8th Gen Accord from Holdcroft Honda Stoke

Hello,
I'm posting this to showcase a complaint I have with the Holdcroft Honda Dealership in Cobridge, I rang the Stoke Volvo office to query the complaints process as I'd been told that the only step left to me was to take the Honda dealership to court, however I've found the Holdcroft complaints procedure online clearly detailing there's an escalation process to the customercare team, which is something Honda haven't advised.
I had asked Managing Director to speak to me about this along with his PA, however on multiple occasions I’ve had no luck in getting through to either, I sent most of the prior information to him directly on email but never had a response other than from a dealer principle from Warrington who said the MD was considering the company stance on my complaint, that’s the last I heard.
The complaint is in relation to the purchase of two vehicles from Holdcroft Honda Cobridge, one a Honda Accord EX GT and a brand new Honda Civic SR, we've had, and continue to receive appalling service from the dealership on both vehicles.
The complaint at present has led me to contact a separate Honda branch to arrange for both car's to be serviced there, which adds over 20 miles of distance for servicing or warranty, however at present I feel it's the best way to ensure that both cars are checked and serviced properly, as the checks and service we've had at Cobridge is dismal.
Firstly the Civic, we purchased a brand new Civic and traded in our 2016 Toyota Auris 1.4d Business Edition, we wanted an EX grade however there were apparently some issues around what the car was valued at which would have meant we would have needed to put down I believe over £3000 in addition to the deposit for the vehicle, we settled on a lower trim level and asked for the Heated seats from an EX to be installed into the SR vehicle as part of the purchase.
We also asked for a set of He-Man dual controls to be installed into the vehicle as it would be used by my wife who's a driving instructor, these are required for her work - and we've used the He-Man sets of dual controls in every car we've had for over 10 years with no issues nor fuss.
The offer letter for the car was printed and said "Heated Seats" & "Dual Controls", to which we queried in both cases with the sales exec at the time - You ARE fitting the EX heated seats and HE-MAN dual controls right? That's what we asked for, the sales exec assured us not to worry about it not being fully described on the offer letter as he would be dealing with the installation and as we'd told him what we wanted in detail during the discussions he knew what kit we wanted installing in the vehicle.
We also queried the service interval on the vehicle, we were told it was to be 10,000 miles which was the same as the Auris, that's good as it meant we wouldn't be spending more on servicing, I quickly asked the parts team to price up a service kit as we took the Auris to an independent garage for servicing and used a genuine service kit, they told me the Civic was on a 6000 mile service schedule not 10,000.
I queried this with the sales and service team who assured me it's 10,000.
Fast forward to the day of collection and the sales exec informs both my wife and I that he received an email THAT MORNING stating the service intervals were now 6000 not 10,000 - not what was said originally.
In addition when we looked over the car we found that the heated seat switches were missing from the dash (under the touch screen), I asked the sales exec where they were, and he said down at the bottom of the seat - I said why aren't they in the dash like they're supposed to be? His response was because they're aftermarket, you didn't think you were getting Honda ones did you? I'm utterly floored at this point as the dealership hasn't fitted what I asked, despite me querying this on the offer letter and being assured what we asked for was what was going to be fitted, both my wife and I were party to the conversation with the sales exec.
I took a closer look over the car and found the switches for the aftermarket seats weren't even sitting into the seat, they were falling out, in addition the wiring to power the heated seat was falling out of the centre console (near the handbrake switch), which I had to push back under the centre console to prevent it getting caught on the seat runners and potentially damaging the system if it shorted to the steelwork on the seats.
We took the car home, and then brought it back less than 2 days later when it conked out, I mean in the sense the car refused to start and it displayed an anti theft warning on the dash board, there was nothing turning the key would do - we attempted to 'bump start' the car three times which made no difference, only starting on the 4th attempt.
I brought the car straight back to the dealership for it to be looked at however service weren't available, and the sales exec told me well I don't know what you want me to do other than call out the AA. A long story short here the AA recovery arrived and found that the battery connections were loose and there was condensation in the headlamps - he tightened the cables back up and we drove home. My assumption here is the heated seat installer didn't correctly tighten the cables back up after disconnecting the battery when installing the seats, however it poses the question why wasn't the car checked over before hand over? Surely there's some check done to make sure the car looks OK?
Fast forward again to the next fault we had which was the alarm going off on it's own with no one in the vehicle. This has happened repeatedly, the only fix I've found is disabling the ultrasonic sensors inside of the vehicle, leaving the car less secure (there's a button on the roof console to turn them off temporarily). In addition to this my wife reports that the dual controls have seized, the brake pedal is now on the floor and won't move. She calls the dealership to be palmed off with a response from the same sales exec who sold us the car that essentially said call the installer directly, what do you want me to do? Which she did, however shouldn't have had to as the contract for installing those dual controls is with the dealership, we're not directly involved with the installer.
Anyway she called the installer who said oh yeah they get stuck sometimes, you need to move a swivel switch.
Now at this point note we've had HE-Man dual controls for over 10 years with no issues nor fuss, never had a problem and most certainly they've never seized on any car we've had - as it's a huge safety issue if your car starts to emergency stop on it's own!
My wife managed to free up the dual controls, however this happened 2-3 more times and during this time I'd engaged the dealership to find out what's happening with the controls, as I was on site most weeks due to my Honda Accordneeding more warranty work (it's needed a LOT which is still ongoing!) I was told by the new car sales manager that he wasn't sure what was happening with the duals but the guy they used was reputable and approved, so I asked for his details.
I received the details at the end of the day after having to ask a few times to get a response, it was at this point I found they'd used a random man-in-a-van, so I called HE-Man directly to see if he worked for them as an approved installer, they confirmed in email (attached) that he's not one of their approved installers.
So at this point we'd asked for HE-Man dual controls and genuine heated seats from the EX Grade Civic and we've received aftermarket heated seats alongside a dual control kit that hasn't been installed or approved by HE-Man - i spoke to the dealer principal who said to me:
"Because you're so fussy with the kit you have in the car, you contact He-Man and sort it out and I'll pay for it"
(Amazingly when I brought this quote up on site he now argues he never said that)
Which I did, I contacted HE-Man and asked them for a list of installers near me and the price on a kit for the new shape Civic.
He-Man told me there was no kit for the Civic yet, as they'd not manufactured one, and they'd need a vehicle for 6 weeks to do so.
So now we've got incorrect heated seats installed, along with dual controls installed by an unapproved installer that aren't even a HE-Man product!
I’d note here that driving instructors use specialised motor vehicle insurance, a lot of which won't insurance the vehicle if they aren’t using official HeMan dual controls (I've had this checked)– which isn’t a bad thing as they represent quality reliability and safety, they’re controlling the brake and clutch of the car, they have to be in perfect working order and made properly otherwise you’re putting people’s lives at risk.
I spoke to the 2 closest installers alongside speaking with HeMan on what else could be fitted to a vehicle, and at this point they gave me two numbers of fitters and only one option - to fit what's called a general purpose kit, which is a prototype kit that needs to be adapted to the floor pan of the vehicle.
I contacted both numbers, the first refused to take the existing kit out of the vehicle because of deemed liability on his part if anything goes wrong, the second asked me to meet him at a HE-Man conference so he could have a look over the car to see if he could potentially get the general purpose kit installed, as there was no guarantee's on it being able to be installed in this shape of Civic.
I took the car down to meet the installer, who looked at the existing kit and immediately managed to pull the brake pedal off of the car, it wasn't even bolted in place, he proceeded to look over the driver’s side and noticed the clutch cablewas starting to fray (this is a fairly hefty steel cable), he advised that the installation wasn't fit for purpose and he would not advise to continue driving the car, stating the car only had 1-2 months of life left in that kit before it failed and potentially damaged the car - note at this point every time the dual controls failed in the vehicle they caused the car to come to an emergency stop, putting the life of both my wife, her pupil and other road users at risk.
I spoke to the dealership again and said the easiest way to resolve this was to take the new shape Civic back and give me a 2017 previous shape Civic, however I’d want some serious good will applied because of the dismal service I’ve received and the dangerous condition the car’s been left in, the reason I asked for a previous generation Civic was that HeMan had already produced a kit for that shape of Civic and so it was available as a production item, not the general purpose kit that we were offered for the new shape, all of the fixing points and assessments had been looked at, whereas with a general purpose kit the installation is dependent on the individual installer first wanting to take up the work as it’s a large risk on their part, secondly the installer being able to install the kit and mount it in such a way that it doesn’t damage anything on the other side of the floor pan or bulk head.
I felt the previous generation Civic would have sorted both the installation of non-approved heated seats and the installation of non-approved dual controls, and at this point I’d say that at no point during the sales process did the dealership come back to either my wife or I to ask or verify that we were using:
· A non-approved installer that was not He-Man approved
· A non-approved set of He-Man Dual controls
· A third party to install the heated seats
· The fitting of non-genuine heated seats
There was no dialog or checking with us at all, and my argument with the dealership rightly includes that I took the word of the sales exec as someone I could trust with making what I wanted in the vehicle happen – as I described it, I didn’t realise I needed to hand hold the dealership and correct them at every turn, which is what I’ve had to do on both vehicles.
I found a vehicle at the Warrington branch that I wanted brought to Cobridge, I’d already spoken to the dealer principle at Warrington whom I’ve had a number of chats with and I find to be an honest and open guy who’s willing to assist where he can, and he agreed the car could be sent down and it wasn’t a problem.
I asked the Cobridge team to bring the car for me to view with a view to sending back the new shape and taking the old one, something that was deemed to not be a problem by Jack, the sales exec we spoke to when we went down to the dealership in the evening after I’d met up with the installer from He-Man to assess the state of the current installation.
The next day I chased to see if he’d spoken to the Warrington team, “No they’re still in their sales meeting”, fair enough, I called back after dinner – “Jacks with another customer” , fair enough but can someone find out if he’s called Warrington please – “Yes no problem”.
I got no call back, in the end I got my wife to call the dealership as I didn’t have the time to call again, and she spoke to Jack who said he’d been calling me both on my mobile and office line all day to update me (I’ve no missed calls, voicemails on either my mobile or office line at this point) but the new car sales manager has blocked me from bringing that car down to the dealership until your complaint is resolved.
So at this point my resolution was to use a previous generation Civic, but I was blocked from doing so.
More conversations with the dealership occurred and I asked the finance company to process a complaint also and to get involved with things at the dealership, their complaint is ongoing but essentially I told both parties that if the car is off the road, as we’ve been advised not to drive it, then I need a replacement vehicle ASAP as it’s used to run a business and we can’t afford to not have it on the road for a prolonged period of time.
We looked at getting a lease car and returning the Civic however the shortest lease time was 3 months and £600 a month on top of the Civic payments, the finance company wouldn’t halt the finance during the complaint even if the car went back to the dealership so we were left with no option but to explore the fitting of the general purpose kit.
It was at this point I’d also learned that should there be an accident with the vehicle then no one is insured as the vehicle would be running with an existing known fault, I explained this to the new car sales manager and his response was that this was “False Information” and that we would be covered by insurance – I had this checked by my eldest daughter who works in insurance and she confirmed that the insurance would likely not be covered as it breaches what’s classed as taking reasonable care of the vehicle.
So again at this point the dealership has told me one thing and what’s actually happening is different.
At every point of the complaint with the dealership they’ve gone back to the offer letter saying it states only dual controls and heated seats, which we queried at the time and were assured this wouldn’t be a problem, now conveniently the sales exec ‘forgot’ that conversation even happened, and whilst the dealership argues it doesn’t state genuine heated seats or heman dual controls it also does not state anywhere that they would be fitting generic heated seats, by a third party I was unaware of and unapproved dual controls by an unapproved installer.
I’ve posed this question to the dealership and had no response each time, I’ve asked why when the car was having these parts fitted did no one send anything to me to query if this dual control kit was OK, or this heated seat system, or can we use other parts for the dual controls as an official production kit wasn’t available? The only reason I can think that they didn’t ask me was that they were fully aware it wasn’t what I wanted and should they have contacted me It would have raised a country sized red flag in terms of this not being what we asked for and discussed with the sales exec during the sales process.
To be crystal clear here, if I’d have known they weren’t fitting what we asked for we would not have purchased the vehicle, I can't stress this enough – we would have carried on with the Auris (which had factory heated seats alongside a production approved HeMan dual control set) which had never had an issue in the 2 years we had it, in comparison both cars we’ve had from Holdcroft have been a nightmare to deal with.
At this point we’ve had the general purpose kit installed and it appears to work OK, however I mentioned to both the dealer and finance company that I was reluctant to look into this option as it wasn’t a production kit, and my sneaking suspicion was that should I have this installed, the dealership would write off the safety critical aspect of my complaint, which they have done insisting they’ve fixed the problem, which they haven’t – I’ve had to fix everything myself, organise the fitting, speak to the company, meet with installers, take the car to Birmingham for the day (so I lost a day’s wage there in addition to my wife), and even though we’ve now got a HeMan kit, it still wasn’t what we asked for, it should have been a production kit, not a kit that’s had to be grinded down and welded for it to fit properly as I’m sure you’d appreciate it wouldn’t look the same, and for a £24000 car I wanted everything to be as it should have been, a factory car, with factory seats and a factory approved he man dual control kit – something the dealership should have made me aware of during the sales process and did not.
Again if the dual controls were not available for the Civic we would not have brought the vehicle. If the seats to be installed were described to have been non genuine we would not have brought the vehicle.
We had a production kit on the Auris and factory heated seats, I’m struggling to understand the dealerships viewpoint in that I’d go from that car to then give them £24000 for a brand new vehicle but say yeah fit the cheapest seats and controls you want it’s fine. We just wouldn’t and didn’t do that, and it shouldn’t be too much of a stretch for the customer to expect the sales exec to deliver on what’s discussed during the sales process, otherwise why have conversations about new cars at all if you can’t trust what’s being said verbally?
I managed to find out who they’d used to fit the heated seats and the dealer principles issue was the installed seats were a 2 stage heating system and the EX Civic is a 3 stage, and they weren’t compatible, of which I replied I asked for genuine ones, this isn’t my concern, fix it – they refused. They offered to move the switches anywhere else if it was suitable, which it was not as my issue was that it wasn’t a genuine kit.
I came up with a compromise arrangement, the installer they used make both a 2 stage and 3 stage heating system, if a 3 stage system was fitted instead, the installer (and I’ve spoken to them and confirmed this already, however the price would be over £720) could make use of the genuine Honda heated seat switches and replace the small plastic section over the heater controls which doesn’t currently have the switch blanks present, and this would give me a set of seats that look as close to OEM as possible, as Honda rejected the fitting of a complete EX setup as it would cost too much money – they refused to even investigate what parts they’d need to replace and what the cost would be, it was an outright refusal without investigating.
At this point I asked the question on why the offer of a 3 stage system wasn’t given to me during the sales process, why a 2 stage when the EX Civic has a 3 stage system as standard? It’s almost as if again if they’d have told me this I would have quickly realised they weren’t using genuine parts.
Honda rejected this offer and their final response to me has been to replace the SR seats with a new set which aren’t modified and to refund the £600 it cost them to put the 2 stage heated seats into the vehicle – its either that or take legal action I’ve been told as I asked for the escalation process and nowhere did the dealership make reference to Holdcrofts complaints procedure (a little odd that one of the dealerships doesn’t know their own complaints procedure?)
Honda are stating they’ve followed a rigorous sales procedure and they’ve essentially done nothing wrong (and are even pointing me towards their previous motor ombudsman decisions!), however what we agreed with the sales exec and what we queried when the offer form was supplied we were told not to worry and that everything would be sorted as we’d agreed with him, even to the point we asked for a specific range of number plates, pick what you want on a new car he said, we gave him a number of specific plates and he came back a week or so later with a list which had none of the ones we asked for – this is all that’s available we were told, again another example of being promised something and not delivering.
I mean take my Honda Accord, brought in February for an extortionate sum considering what’s gone wrong with it, the Approved Used Honda check on the vehicle was carried out by Stevie Wonder, as the amount of faults I was left with on the car is a joke – which I’ve since found out the technician was sacked from the dealership not long after completing my check, amazingly I had a service done at the start of this month on the Accord where the technician highlighted I needed a new tyre as it had 1.6mm of tread on an inner edge, I took it to an independent tyre fitter who has rubbished the health report as he can’t find tread lower then 3.1mm – when I queried this over the phone earlier this week I was told the technician again is no longer with the dealership, brilliant, every time I find something wrong with the Accord, the offending staff member disappears!
I’m in the process of contacting Honda Warrington to ask them to perform the approved used check as I doubt the technical capability of Cobridge after what’s gone on, and I’m hoping there’s been no safety items missed that could lead me to an accident. I mean if they can’t check tyre tread properly, what other life threatening faults could the Accord or the Civic be hiding that the dealership just isn’t competent enough to see?
To date, and this isn’t an exhaustive list as the dealership won't release to me the warranty work information that was done prior to me picking up the car to add to the service pack I have with the car…
· DPF Forced regeneration
· DPF Acid Treatment
· DPF Replacement Filter Fitted
· New Clutch Master Cylinder fitted (after greasing the old one) - which is now squeaking again less than 5000 miles in...
· New Door Trim (It was actually stolen by a staff member from another Accord for sale on the dealership and placed on to mine)
· New switch pack on the passenger door
· Handbrake adjustments as it wouldn't hold on a hill - they said it's normal...
· New 4 wheel alignment as the previous one hadn’t centred the steering wheel properly
· There’s still a chip in the windowscreen to repair
· The boot water channel was resprayed
· It’s been sold with two rear tyres with cracks in the rubber
· It wasn’t serviced prior to pick up, I’ve now got to pay for an air con clean as it stinks when it first comes on every now and again – I’m hoping the clean fixes it and it’s not something else going wrong.
This is in 6 months of owning the car, its actually been to site that many times that I know almost everyone's name on site, I’m on first name basis with everyone on site, and I even had a customer approach me asking me to explain the technical features on the Civic to him – I’m being mistaken as Staff!
The servicing on the Accord was also a joke, I brought it on finance which meant 2 free services, I was called up by the holdcroft team to book it in for it’s major service and I said it’s good I have two free services, “Oh no they’re only for minor services” “You’ll need to pay us £150 for the major service”, WHAT? I had to query this with the service manager on site to get the work done as a free service.
At every point, in both car experiences, this dealership has found a way of messing up and trying to assume there is either nothing wrong or I’m in the wrong here.
I’ve tried approaching the Motor trade ombudsman but they refuse to look into the case as the car’s being used for business, trading standards have been informed following a call with citizens rights and the consumer helpline and they are due to get in touch potentially acting as a dispute resolution service, however I can’t see this helping now that Honda have issued their final stance which is to replace the seats with new ones which aren’t heated and refund the £600 cost for installing them, however that still leaves me out of pocket, the 3 stage kit is £720 and the installer has informed me it would be extra for them to fit them into Honda switches as they’d need to bench test the system first, in addition I’d need to provide them with the switches, plugs for the back of the switches along with the dash plastic to be replaced.
I wanted a new car personally to replace my 2006 Skoda Fabia Vrs, which I’m glad I’ve kept as I'm leaving an open invitation here on the forum that if anyone would like to give me the outstanding balance on the Accord they can happily take the car off my hands and I’ll go back to the Skoda, as that car has never let me down in 4 years of motoring whereby I’ve done 50,000miles upwards, the Accord however has had all of these problems in 5,000 miles.
I’ve actually been to site that many times I’ve driven most of the courtesy cars, in pretty much every engine size and gearbox variant, alongside model – I’ve only the CR-V left!
We wanted the Civic as a more affordable car to run than the Auris, we were told it would be cheaper to finance (it wasn't), cheaper to run and more reliable (HA!) however the amount of problems the dealer has caused with both vehicles has left us feeling like we’re the ones in the wrong for buying a Honda in the first place, we stated what we wanted during the sales process and we also queried what was put on the offer letter and we were assured it would be as we described, an official He-Man dual control kit and genuine heated seats from an EX grade Civic – the sales exec was quoted as saying “I can fit any optional extra into a vehicle” something the dealership now denies, strangely despite everyone that denies it not being part of the original conversations.
We’re now left with a car that costs more than our previous one, with a cracked centre console (thanks to the dual control installer originally, which again Honda seemed to miss on their checks that the centre console is hanging off on the passenger side), damaged seats as the switches for the existing heated seats keep falling out. And this is independent of the alarm issue that can potentially reoccur, the window wipers that when set to auto seem to move to full speed with a single drop of rain hits the screen, but it slows down in a downpour, the ADAS kit that occasionally reports every road in the UK as a no overtaking lane…it’s been such a nightmarish time that it’s actually affected my wife’s health a large way, something the dealer principle over the phone (because he doesn’t put much in writing, and when asked about things he ignores them via writing) denies having any adverse affect on, which is in complete contradiction to both the Warrington & Stuart Graham branches who when I asked for a second opinion there both immediately understood that the stress it’s placed on both my wife and I would have a negative impact on health.
It’s left me not wanting another Honda, and that's despite the fact I love the styling in the Accord, I was even considering an import of a Gen9 at some point but they've shot my confidence in the brand, in addition it’s begun to spread like wildfire that this dealership isn’t to be trusted amongst the driving instructors in stoke on trent, and considering theres 39,000 of them in the UK, it doesn’t take long for that experience to shun people away from the new Civic, the word's also spreading amongst the pupil base, if you consider for every one instructor there's at least 10 different pupils being taught at one time period, and we're getting feedback from pupils already when they're asked what car they'd consider for their first car, they're immediately writing off the Civic because of the way Holdcroft sells and manages customers.
The dual controls, don’t look the best, but they’re a He-man kit installed by a He-Man installer, so I trust they shouldn’t fail, they just don’t look the best because they aren’t a production item, but I’m not happy that I had to do the majority of the leg work to fix the problem myself because the dealership were utterly clueless in being able to sort this out, and It makes sense for them to ask me to deal with it now, considering there was no production kit available, something they should have known as you’d assume they would have contacted He-Man to get the controls fitted, it looks like they didn’t contact them at all despite us asking specifically for that brand of controls.
The heated seats aren’t a genuine item, and I’ve even tried to come to a compromise agreement with the dealership to put a higher grade of heated seat in from the installer which will allow for the installing of genuine Honda switches, making the system look OEM which should have been what we received in the first place.
All we want is a safe car that’s as we discussed, which Honda have refused.
I’m not asking for the world to be put right,
just replace the seats with either an EX installation (which Honda said would cost too much and be too complex), or fit a three stage system from the installer and use Honda Switches, to date we’ve been offered no apology, no admission of any wrong doing on either cars and certainly no good will to put things right in context of what’s gone wrong – I couldn’t seem to get through to the dealership you could have killed someone, and they’ve treated my complaint like I’ve a scuff on an alloy wheel.
I'm hoping the customer care team can offer some assistance, as Honda Customer Service UK have been a joke thus far, the Accord is too old for them to care despite it being under warranty and an approved used vehicle, the Civic they won't touch either as all Honda dealers in the UK are franchised so it's not their problem, they're quoted as saying they're "Honda in name only".

Moral of the story? Don't ask for any optional extras or anything that's not a completely standard vehicle that they have to do nothing to - they're not competent enough to get it right, although saying that, my Accord was a standard vehicle and that's been fraught with problems too, nothing optional or extra there, just a heap of things not working and not checked before sale - despite being approved used. Make of that what you will.

I won't be touching Holdcroft Honda Stoke again - we're moving to get the car's serviced in Warrington at a separate dealership as a result along with getting another approved used safety check performed on the Accord as the first one was performed by Stevie wonder...
 
#10 ·
Reply



Can't seem to get multiquote to work, clicked it but it didn't then appear in the reply box below, so having to do them one at a time at the minute.

The costs are difficult to put into claim terms, sure I could try claiming for the lost work, but there's also the emotional damages it's caused alongside the hours of my time I've spent trying to get a resolution - it's difficult to quanity, especially seen as Holdcroft Honda say they can't understand how any of this has emotionally affected my wife, erm....really?

At the minute I just want the seats to be put right as I agreed with the salesman, which they refuse to do, and their refund of £600 they offered leaves me short another £120 for the uprated kit plus I've got to buy the Honda parts (switches and plugs and dash trim) to swap over so it looks OEM, which is how it should have been.

Thanks for the welcome :D
 
#6 ·
I have purchased and have had cars serviced by Holdcroft Honda.
To be fair, initially we had issues with the service side, but since their new service manager has come along, it's been pretty good.
The only downside is that I never let them valet my car, as this portion of the service I will be the first to admit is atrocious.
Most of the dealership know me by name, but my experience went from a negative to a positive.
 
#11 ·
Reply



I'd agree with the new Service Manager, Christians a god send to that place, I've quite literally got to the point where I don't deal with anyone else with repairs, we go straight to his office and I tell him something else has either fallen off or broken, and he sorts it out, but he's limited in terms of what he can do on the Civic because it's crossing a line between service and sales.

I have heard some stories about the previous service manager!

Yeah I had the accord valeted when it was serviced last month and there's swirl marks everywhere plus the interior side of the windows is caked in grease, they've used the same cloth for both dash trim and window I imagine...it's not a difficult thing to get right when you have so many cars on site is it :frown2:

Oh I'm the same on the name front, my review of the dealership has spread throughout the holdcroft group so I'm told, I'm trying to get a meeting with the managing director of Holdcroft because the response I was given yesterday is he feels because the dealership has broken my trust there's nothing Holdcroft can do to remedy it that would work for me so it's best I go to another dealership in future - hang on surely that's passing the buck again? Oh someones had a bad time, pfft - tell them to go elsewhere! :surprise:

I'm looking for that negative to positive swing myself, but they're very unwilling to make that happen, there's a lot of "my salesman would never have said that" but they're quick to then argue my account of events doesn't stand up in court as it's subjective, well hang on so is your's with the salesman wouldn't have said it?
 
#7 ·
The adding of EX seats for heating into a SR I would of said was a none starter as they're factory fit. I didn't even know you could get after market heated seats and like you I would of wanted originals which are not a option fit in any Civic manuals so it's EX or a MK 9 SR.
He-man controls I have no knowledge of fitting but as you've probably worked out it looks like a jack of all trades master of none has been used that (I know a guy) bloke in order to cut costs in fitting. Definitely spoilt your purchase experience because of what appears to be a 'get a sale at any (but not much more) cost'. You could try writing your experience to Auto Express as they sometimes take up the challenge on behalf of the consumer.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
#12 ·
Reply



Well the car was brand new, so it was done on the order sheet - it wasn't a stock car on the forecourt, it was literally ordered in as they didn't have the correct paint colour we wanted etc. So we asked for the He-Man Duals (as she's used them for 10 years with no issues) and seats from an EX, as we'd drove the EX and wanted an EX, but because of what was owing on the Auris as a trade in we went for the lower one and asked for the EX seats to be put in - the salesman was quoted as saying "I can fit any optional extra into any car", so at this point he's happy to do it and he's stating it's an optional extra, it was only when we got the generic ones installed and I queried it did everyone change their tune to say "it's not an optional extra on the SR, it can't be done"

Apparantley they used the non approved installer on recommendation from their motability specialist BAS (who I contacted and said they can't confirm they've ever passed on recommendations to Holdcroft Honda Stoke) who recommended him, however he fitted a non-approved kit, he wasn't approved himself - none of this was even queried with us at any point, they never approached me to say can we use X person as he's not He-Man affiliated or this kit that's not He-Man, or can we use this 3rd party to fit a 2 stage heated seat kit. Because any of those questions would have pointed towards them using different kit to what I agreed with the salesman and I would have cancelled the purchase and stuck with the auris.

Ill look into auto express! Been struggling to think of where else to go to be honest, Honda Karma was my biggest one as it seemed to get the largest response, and openly proved they're deleting negative reviews.
 
#8 ·
Thanks for the welcome guys let me take a minute to reply to your comments, and yes it's an epic read.
I posted it on Hondakarma as I was pretty active on there looking for help on the Accord - magically I've been blocked and the reasoning I was given before they blocked me (as I asked why and got blocked as a result) is because Honda rang up threatening legal action, now I was wondering which division of Honda this would be, I've asked Honda UK and they said it's not a forum they're affiliated with, and I've since found Holdcroft Honda are / or were a major partner to the forum - funny that, deleting negative experiences, it's no wonder I was none the wiser going in to purchase the cars when they;d hidden the bad press :/ !
 
#15 · (Edited)
...I posted it on Hondakarma as I was pretty active on there looking for help on the Accord - magically I've been blocked and the reasoning I was given before they blocked me (as I asked why and got blocked as a result) is because Honda rang up threatening legal action, now I was wondering which division of Honda this would be, I've asked Honda UK and they said it's not a forum they're affiliated with, and I've since found Holdcroft Honda are / or were a major partner to the forum - funny that, deleting negative experiences, it's no wonder I was none the wiser going in to purchase the cars when they;d hidden the bad press :/ !
LOL, the Honda Karma forum is run by someone who is utterly obsessed with all things Honda and has employment/personal links to Holdcroft Honda... I was a regular contributor for several years (username 'Zebster') but was also banned (for daring to suggest that Toyota cars are just as reliable as Honda cars).

Good luck with your battle. I think you need to get legal support... does your insurance policy offer this?
 
#13 ·
Hindsight's a wonderful thing, and little help to your situation, but what it does show is :


Due dilligence is key, meaning own checks if a specialist kit (he-man controls) is available yet for a particular model before ordering (would have liked a tow bar for my mk1 TT but surprisingly found out there's no tow bar available)

Own checks of listed Honda available options to the model chosen before commiting to order (thinking heated seats).

Don't automatically believe what the salesman is sat there saying.(bought a new BMW way back, when the most pleasant and helpful salesman assured us many times he would have fitted for us reversing sensors at the dealership before collection of the car and never happened)

Almost certainly the Honda dealership salesman has no idea or interest whether he-man controls are available for a model, the sale being number one priority, and let the dual control people worry about that.
 
#14 ·
Reply



Oh I completely agree, I though we had done enough due dilligence in pointing out that the paperwork didn't reflect what was said - and we made sure to get a verbal agreement from the salesman of which both myself and my wife were party to, to avoid them saying it was a 1-2-1 discussion and my account of events could be false.

It does seem a case of bag a sale and move on, yet with the previous toyota's we've had, they rang us at every point in the process when they'd spoken to the dual control installer, when they were coming down, that we could check them over to make sure we were happy etc. fantastic in comparison. We only moved away from them as they kept arguing there was no warranty on the car as it was being used by a driving instructor - we had to get toyota UK involved to correct them, but they were never happy in looking at the car and whenever my wife went up alone they would give her a load of verbal that they wouldnt say to me.

I've just spoken to the Trusted Dealers site and reported them to them, they asked me to complete a review and it should have come out automatically, yet when he looked into the system - there'd been no survey issued for the Civic, they're approaching Holdcroft to find out why that didn't happen - almost as if they didn't want a bad review? Picking and choosing experiences to add to their statistics it seems!
 
#16 · (Edited)
Like Das says hit them with a small claims court writ.
When you win, escalate it to the High Court and watch while the Sheriffs collect your money.

Recommend a read of the Honest John website to swot up on your legal rights under the new Consumer Protection rules so your threatening letter, delivered by registered post sounds more professional than they do.
 
#20 ·
Reply



I don't know if I can take it to small claims, for a few reasons (cue the list! lol)
1: Car value is £24000 which is over the £10000 limit for small claims court (or so citizens advice told me)
2: Evidence wise, what's written down supports their view of events more than it supports my own - I'm in the process of trying to gather as much supporting evidence as I can but there's very little direct evidence because what we agreed was verbally with the salesman who's now got Amnesia..
3: The purchase of the Accord falls under consumer rights, however the Civic does not fall under consumer rights law, as the vehicle is being used for a business purpose, which is incredibly annoying.
 
#17 ·
This sounds about right for this dealership and I would urge everyone to give them a wide birth. I wouldn’t touch another Honda with a barge pole after my experience with Holdcroft Cobridge. Here’s the review I left them on their Facebook page, I’ve since been in touch with the lad who purchased the car and he wasn’t aware that the gearbox required removing and inspecting when he purchased the car. I was kind in my review and missed out quite a number of issues that I have with Jack and that dealership, anyway here goes.

After hearing great reviews about this dealership from the likes of TDI North and Tegiwa on various social media pages I decided to contact them to see if they could source me a Championship White FK2 Civic Type R. They called me back after about an hour with details of a car that was coming to them as a part ex and I decided to view the car.

Everything was going well on the test drive apart from a quiet whistling/whining noise when the engine was under load, I asked them to investigate but I believed it was a simple case of a loose hose/intake pipe so I paid for the car.

I was contacted the day after sending payment to be advised that the mechanic believes that there’s an issue within the gearbox and that it would need to be removed for inspection. I rejected the car instantly and requested a refund. This was before signing any paperwork and taking ownership of the vehicle, things turned rather sour afterwards.

I was promised by Jack on the Thursday that payment would be returned quickly but received nothing that day so called again on the Friday to distress that I required the money urgently so that I could find a new car. Numerous exchanges were made throughout the day and Jack promised that everything was processed on there end and that I would receive the refund within two hours. Nothing hit my account on the Friday.

I called and spoke to Simon on Saturday morning, Jack wasn’t in. Simon checked the system and advised me that the payment hadn’t been processed and Jack was showing his inexperience. Blatant lies more like pal.

To my horror the car with the gearbox issue pops up on my instagram feed sat on someone else’s drive, sold with a faulty gearbox. I commented on the post questioning their integrity with the new owner which swiftly got deleted and I got blocked from their Instagram account. Trying to hide something Holdcroft?

We are now on Monday, I called Jack to discuss his inability to be honest and the fact that they have sold a car with a known gearbox problem, I threatened to go into the dealership if they didn’t arrange my refund immediately.

Thankfully my refund is all sorted however they have left a young man with a car with a problem that should of been fixed before selling.

Please avoid at all costs.
 
#21 ·
Reply



Did you leave a review on google? They've since closed all reviews on their facebook page in addition to letting people comment or like posts, it's share only now - strangely as I started posting things on their facebook page. It's infuriating that a dealership would actively stop people either positively or negative engaging with them via social media when it should be one of their main forms of advertising.

Yes I've dealt with Jack also, he was the one we asked to get a car down from Warrington, chased it twice before asking the wife to ring as I had a lot else to do, the reply was we've been trying to call your fella all day despite me having no missed calls or voicemails on either mobile or the office line. Every person in sales I've had to deal with has found some way of not doing what I've asked or completely lied to my face, admittedly other than Ray - who will quite happily tell you something is complete balls in front of everyone, as it should be - Ray's great. :grin2:
 
#18 ·
There's a good guide on money saving expert on how to do the small claims court, just remember everything counts, all travel to and from, telephone calls, time off work, fitting of parts, buying service parts, meetings, will soon add up. Last time I bought a new car I had everything in duplicate, even the stuff not mentioned on the invoice, overkill I know but it works for me.
Good luck and welcome to the forum, and keep us posted
 
#22 ·
Reply



I'm not sure if small claims an option though. Ideally I'd love to just get the money for getting the parts and get it installed myself, because it's clear Holdcroft Cobridge aren't willing to do anything - and I find it difficult to get anything in writing as the dealer principle prefers face to face shockingly...then denies what's been said...

How did you manage to get all of that information together? At the minute they've refused to give me info, I asked for all the warranty work done on the Accord and I was told we can show you on screen but that's it...odd seen as it's on my car :surprise:

Thanks for the welcome.
 
#27 ·
Travel:- miles travelled at business rate, also claim for parking, (keep receipt) Telephone calls:- If it’s a landline all outgoing calls are logged and priced, mobile, you will get that from service provider. Time off work, assuming you earn £10ph that’s £1 every six minutes, so If you had a meeting that lasted 18 minutes, you’ve lost £3 in wages. Parts and fitting you already know the price of.
Warranty work on screen, ask for a printout, if they won't give you that then tell HUK you suspect them of fudging the service schedule.
This is a direct quote from a letter that I sent to HUK about my dealership, take note of the second paragraph. Make of it what you want but as all the franchises are company owned Honda will always refer you to their company mediation, in short don’t expect too much help from Honda.

Naturally, we are always concerned to receive any criticism of our retail organisation, a network of which we are proud. All of our dealerships are closely monitored through regular customer surveys, which are completed on our behalf through an independent company, and by feedback from our customers by letter or telephone call into our department. The surveys cover all aspects of the dealerships conduct in sales and service and are scored on their performance.
If the dealerships are found to create a number of complaints, they are monitored more closely for a certain period, if their performance continues below Honda standards they will eventually have their franchise withdrawn from their company. As I am sure you can understand our dealerships would not want to risk this happening and so make every effort to maintain high standards throughout their business.
 
#28 ·
reply



I think I was quoted the exact same from HUK.
I'll start making a list of charges. I'm querying at the minute if I can get my Accord to have another Honda Used Safety Check, as the one they did I think was fudged as the technician was sacked afterwards - I asked Holdcroft and they said they won't do it as it highlights 5 months worth of wear - erm, yes but it's still under warranty for one, and two a competent technician should be able to see if certain faults are longstanding or have occurred recently.

I asked for the offer letter on the Civic last week and I was met with a response of sorry I cant, all correspondence is to go through the dealer principle (the entire dealership has been told not to talk to me by Holdcroft's senior management team), so I assumed he would send me the info as he was CC'd in the reply, nothing. I'm told by the managing directors PA the MD was on site Friday for a meeting to discuss things and this was one of the things on the agenda.

I just don't see their point - the response I've had verbally (because heaven forbid them putting anything in writing) is the MD doesn't know what to do to keep your business, and thinks you should maybe go to a non Holdcroft dealership in future, so essentially we don't want to resolve it and want you to go away? That about sums it up right?:crying: One of my wife's trained driving instructors got in touch at the weekend to say he'd had major problems as well, and ended up going to the dealership daily and causing such a scene customers were leaving the building :serious:

I'm going to ring two other Honda dealers this morning and query the price on a safety check on the Accord, I've been collating evidence at the weekend for negative reviews, trying to find similar cases etc. which is going rather well - there's a lot to choose from, and I'm going to use these as a pack to call out to the MD which I'm looking to get a meeting with.
 
#30 ·
Did you have to pay for the removal of the originally fitted dual controls/fitment of the he-man system, or did the dealership pay.

With the seats, I would have thought because there's nothing on paper you were receiving a Honda factory fit/approved heated seat option and the dealership in response to your unhappiness of their fitment, have offered to refund your money for that together with fresh seats, you may be 'skating on thin ice' regarding additional recompense.

Certainly you've been lead a merry dance by them, stitched you up really with the promise of what you wanted, but were never going to deliver.
 
#31 ·
Reply



I made them pay for it, they tried to tell me it was some form of goodwill, so I corrected them by saying I've already paid for the dual controls, you didn't fit what I asked and as a result it blew up in your face because they failed as a result of using an unapproved installer and non-genuine kit.

I know what you're saying, the issue I have with that is that they're well aware that by me having the seat swap and the refund that I can't install another seat of heated seats, which my wife needs as she struggles with lower back pain, the uprated kit that would be a like for like kit for what's in an EX is another £120 on top of the refunded price, in addition there's the £86 for the Honda switches, £202 for a replacement trim around the heater controls (the existing SR version doesn't have switch blanks), and the price on the plugs for the back of the switches, which Honda inform me they don't have as a separate item so I'd need a complete dash wiring loom just to take 3cm of cable and splice that onto the installers pre-made loom, that's another £1000 plus the extra cost on top of the £720 the installer said they'd need for it being a custom job (bench testing the switch pack etc.)

But yes, I feel like I'm skating uphill - except there's no ice, it's a mountain, and there's lava running down the side towards me...:surprise:

I'm going to be doing a subject access request to get all calls, logs etc. in order to build a case against them, because it's going to need a claim of about £2500-3000 to put the seats in, as good as they would be if Honda did their job properly, that's excluding the cost of fitting new seats though!
 
#33 · (Edited)
Crikey that's a marathon read !!! :smile3: (about 12 hours ago I copied it into notepad and read it offline in several steps).

As soon as you had the initial problem with the badly fitted dual-controls, you should at least have given the dealer one attempt to get it fixed, to your satisfaction, within 1 week. You then had the legal right to leave the car with them and demand either all your money back, or, return of the Auris and anything you'd paid to put you back where you were when you first walked into the dealership to talk to the new-car sales rep. If you'd had to hire a replacement dual-control car in the meantime, you could have also claimed those costs back. You could also have employed solicitors and recovered their costs. You would have easily won in a court, it doesn't matter that the dual-controls were not HeMan, the fact that the dealer used a 3rd party installer who fitted it poorly (and probably would not be able to fix it), means that you had no confidence in the dealer's ability to get any 3rd party to do it timely and properly, to your satisfaction. It cannot be true that there's a £10,000 limit, otherwise there wouldn't be High Court Sheriffs on TV chasing claims of £30k.

Anyway, regarding the Accord, you've met the general incompetence of Honda dealers regarding several of the Accord's issues. Squeaking clutch-pedal - tick , handbrake issues - tick, clogged DPF (8th gen diesel) - tick, 4 wheel alignment issues - tick, switch-pack (8th gen) - tick, sticking rear-brakes (mostly 7th gen but does appear on 8th gen) - not yet, rusty sun-roof (8th gen) - not yet (or already dealt with by previous owner).

Also, as already stated, going to HondaKarma forum with issues like this, would be like going to Scientologists and saying that you'd found an alien space-ship in the rain-forests near the Amazon, but it turned out to be a paddle-steamer that was dumped there 100 years ago. They're (mostly) similar to Scientologists on that forum. If you've also stumbled across another UK forum that does Accords only, they've temporarily stopped new sign-ups due to loads of spam, but that's good because it's a stalking-horse for re-mapping services. AFAIK this forum is the only UK Honda forum where you'll get fair conversation the same way that you would in real life :wink3:

--edited the legal way of handling issues with problem cars from dealers (for anyone reading this in the future)--
 
#45 ·
Reply



Thanks Farqui,

I suck at waiting >:) haha.

Is there something wrong with my multi quotes? I couldn't get it to work, it highlights the posts but then I can't move to the reply screen with them all there, it doesn't do anything, works when I click quote on a single post but not on multi quote.
 
#48 ·
And now the DPF on the Accord has gone AGAIN :serious:

It's already had a new one, what now! No asking for a regen, nothing, just straight to the "!" light, which according to the handbook is a dealer trip. There's no way a brand new DPF should reach that level of build up already, it was replaced in June and it's now only on 66K miles, I brought it at 59K!
 
#49 ·
Well I took the Accord back to the dealership on friday via AA escort as they couldn't understand why it had gone again either.

Dealership refused to accept my keys and said the vehicle would be towed if left.

I asked for this in writing and half way through someone writing the email a call came through and said person told me they'd been instructed to write nothing down.

Went back to the AA and asked him to update the report to state they refused to accept the vehicle, which he did.

Staff member comes outside and says we will "look" at your accord if you remove your reviews online (wife was on the phone at the same time and heard the lot) - something's not quite right with that statement...

I rejected it and said I won't be blackmailed nor bullied by a dealership - (disclaimer: I personally feel it's blackmail, victimisation & bullying however I may be legally wrong)

I sent them a response yesterday asking them to purchase the vehicle back from me for what's owing on the finance for both the Accord and the Civic as they've now refused to repair the Accord or Civic and this includes any warranty or servicing or MOT's, my second offer was if they could not buy the vehicle back then offer something of equivalent value.

They have a deadline of Friday 28th September to respond, or I'll be instigating my final right to reject on the Accord as it really has become the automotive proverbial lemon...:crying:
 
#50 ·
Well on the day of the deadline I got a response from the dealership asking me to come to site to "bring the matter to a close"

I'm due to visit them tomorrow, they insisted they will not put an offer into writing - seems incredibly shady.

They've also told the finance company the reason the DPF has failed again is due to my driving style - that's despite not having the car on site to look over or pull any fault codes from, using their crystal ball they diagnosed that...

At least it's progress.
 
#51 ·
Well on the day of the deadline I got a response from the dealership asking me to come to site to "bring the matter to a close"

I'm due to visit them tomorrow, they insisted they will not put an offer into writing - seems incredibly shady.

They've also told the finance company the reason the DPF has failed again is due to my driving style
- that's despite not having the car on site to look over or pull any fault codes from, using their crystal ball they diagnosed that...

At least it's progress.

We had a 2016 CRV 1.6 twin turbo diesel and due to DPF issues it went at around 10k as for sure it was going to get very expensive. However my point is it is frightening what information is stored on the ECU and for us I can tell you Honda recommend an average speed of 40MPH + not to have any DPF issues and on our CRV from new the average speed was 14MPH. I am sure we can all guess were this could go if the DPF had failed and for the reason we went to a 1.5turbo Civic and have had no issues plus it returns better MPG.



Would I ever buy another diesel, NO they are no longer in fashion with tax brackets due to harmful emissions and having now owned 3 of them (1.7 Mercedes A class no dpf, Auris T180 dpf, CRV dpf) and to be honest none ever did what they were supposed to do then for sure I would not buy another.
 
#52 ·
Reply

It's all down to how you drive it, provided the car gets a 'run' now and again they're no issue, our 10th gen Civic asked for a regen the other day (you could hear the exhaust get loud as it artificially raised the temperature to clear the soot), we put it on the motorway at the given RPM and speed and when we returned later on the exhaust quietened down and everything was OK.

We had an Auris 1.4D with a DPF prior to this and managed 50,000 miles with no issue, and considering the Mrs is a driving instructor most of those miles were town driven with the occasional trip to clear the DPF, the car self regulated and sorted it's own DPF no trouble at all.

The reason the Accord has been a nightmare is because there's an underlying fault Honda refuse to acknowledge, there's supposed to be a smoke symbol come up saying regen required if the car doesn't do it on it's own, it's never popped up since I've had it, indicating a fault on the vehicle, it goes straight to limp mode and skips the warning telling you to regen.
 
#56 ·
So I'm now rid of both the Accord & the brand new Civic, they refused to work on either car, to honour any warranties, or service plans they were still taking money for.

In the end they purchased the car's back from us but charged us to do so, when I asked what the payment was for and how it was calculated i was told you're not allowed to know (alarm bells?)

They called me to site stating they wouldn't put an offer in writing, then when I got to site gave me an offer letter - in writing...we had no other choice but to go for the offer and felt we were pushed into it as we couldnt use any of the local honda garages as they were all Holdcroft - to make matters worse I contacted a non-Holdcroft dealership who said let me look into the history of the Accord and get back to you, rings me back and says because of your complaint with Holdcroft we dont want to get involved either, so that ruled out other dealerships in the area also, the MOT on the accord was coming up, the Civic needed servicing but they refused to do it or repair the warranty items they caused the problems with etc. I asked them to arrange collection of the Accord, they arranged a flat bed, so i finished work early to prep the car - the guy arrives 5 hours later with a copy of the offer letter to sign, ONLY THEY'VE CHANGED THE LETTER.

So he got turned away, I replied to Holdcroft and said I'm signing the letter I agreed to, not your amended one as you never discussed this with me when I had two witnesses present, you're not pulling a fast one -

The response? From the HEAD OF THE HOLDCROFT HONDA BUSINESS?

"Unfortunately my generosity has run out, the failed collection yesterday was out of our control, the aborted collection was at yet again another cost to holdcroft so please arrange the vehicle to be transported or driven to site via your own method"

This is despite earlier stating:

"Please arrange with Mr Mountford for us to organise and collect the vehicle from his address today or tomorrow. This is to ensure Mr Mountford is not put in any danger bringing the car to site."

In the end I rang the AA to move the car down to their site, where they kicked off about there being no V5 and saying they cannot accept a vehicle back without a V5

So I rang DVLA after checking the house and not being able to find it, DVLA confirmed I've NEVER been the registered keeper of this vehicle and there's a blank in their system, there's NO registered keeper showing at all! This means my insurance between Feb-Oct along with the GAP insurance has for all intent and purpose been VOID!

So the dealership didn't even register the V5 in my name when I bought the car! I raised this to them when the Accord was taken to site Via the AA and their hostile tone then changed to one of

"Yeah we know about that, it's fine", even SWMBO noted that they were hostile to me in tone and attitude but not her. 

I'm tempted to take the Fabia back now or continue getting the 205 on the road, but the fabia has a broken shock which ideally wants complete new suspension on, or at least a set of standard put back on it, the foam is wearing on the drivers bolster and the car's losing coolant, we suspect head lift along with it starting with BLT (engine code) hesitation...don't everything come at once ay..!

If anyone else appears on this forum with a Gen8 Crystal Black Pearl Accord EX-GT with reg PN 59 YSV or a 10th Gen Civic SR 1.6 IDtec with reg DG 18 OUY point them towards this thread :) as I'd be more than happy to explain why the cars were sold in the condition they were alongside if they're still seeing problems I can provide them with the entire conversation history showing any faults on the car were existing by the previous owner which should help any warranty claims should they be required.
 
#59 ·
Reply



Indeed - it's somewhat annoying as they own so many dealerships in the local area we're restricted in terms of where we can go from here, and I've got to continue the fight in order to get the money back we paid to send the cars back, I don't think asking for £1232.34 then saying you're not allowed to know what it's for or how it was calculated leaves them on a very stable moral ground...

Unfortunately although I'd have had a Gen9 Civic as a next car I can't now as I'll struggle to get parts anywhere or dealership support! I think I'll have to go back to my old Fabia VRS for the time being.

Didn't require much input from me, this was waaaaay beyond my own experience of civil law.

Considering how bad those 2 cars were, from what I got by email, the OP had to be (and was) very determined.

Most people keel over and walk away from problems with car dealers, which says more about how bad car dealers can be. I have never felt 100% happy with any car dealer of any marque I've ever bought, you soon begin to see past the veneer into a murky world of incompetence and cover-ups.
And continues to be! :grin2: The head of the business thinks this is resolved now, and that they've done nothing wrong...

I'm still dealing with 3-4 people online who are mid complaint with the dealership so I'm assisting them to try and get them the best outcome they can.